ReviewIndian journal of clinical biochemistry : IJCB2025
Metabolic Reprogramming of Anti-cancer T Cells: Targeting AMPK and PPAR to Optimize Cancer Immunotherapy.
Review in Indian journal of clinical biochemistry : IJCB, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decoding signaling architectures: CAR versus TCR dynamics in solid tumor immunotherapy.Acta biochimica et biophysica Sinica · 2026Review
- A Clinically Derived TCM Decoction (WD-3) Attenuates Malignant Phenotypes of Gastric Cancer through the PPARγ-AMPK Pathway.Biological procedures online · 2026Article
- From Bench to Bedside: Emerging Paradigms in CAR-T Cell Therapy for Solid Malignancies.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer treatment era has been revolutionized by the novel therapeutic methods such as immunotherapy in recent years. Immunotherapy-based approaches are considered effective and reliable methods that has brought hope to eradicate certain cancers. Nonetheless, there are some issues, considered as critical obstacles in successful cancer immunotherapy. Such issues are attributed to the ability of the tumor cells in providing a tolerant microenvironment that impairs the immune responses, and help the cancer cells evade the immunogenic cell death. It has been suggested that the re-activation and maintenance of effector immune cells may become possible by metabolic reprogramming. Several signaling pathways have been noticed with the possibility of metabolic reprogramming of tumor-specific T cells, to overcome the metabolic restrictions in the tumor microenvironment; and among them, AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR) have been investigated the most as the main energy sensors and regulators of mitochondrial biogenesis. The synergic effects of AMPK activators and/or PPAR agonists in cancer immunotherapy have been reported. In this review, we compare the roles of AMPK activators and PPAR agonists, and the efficacy of their combination in metabolic reprogramming of cytotoxic T cells in favoring cancer immunotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.