Evidence mapPaperPMID 40123895Full record

ReviewHuman reproduction open2025

Fertility preservation in women with endometriosis.

Antonio La Marca, Michela Semprini, Elisa Mastellari, Valeria Donno, Martina Capuzzo, Carlo Alboni, Simone Giulini

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human reproduction open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation: a review of clinical progress in fertility preservation].Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michela SempriniDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Elisa MastellariUO Tutela Salute Famiglia, Donna ed Età evolutiva, AUSL Romagna, Rimini, Italy.
Valeria DonnoDexeus Fertility, Department of Obstetric Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Hospital Universitari Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain.
Martina CapuzzoTethys-Assisted Reproductive Technologies Center, Verona, Italy.
Carlo AlboniDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Simone GiuliniDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndometriosis is a chronic disease that can compromise fertility in up to 30-50% of affected patients, and it is estimated that patients affected by endometriosis represent about 10% of patients undergoing ART treatments. The hypothesized underlying mechanisms explaining infertility are various, but great attention has been given to the relationship between ovarian endometriomas and reduced ovarian reserve. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE: Infertility in patients with endometriosis does not have univocal management, since surgical therapy can increase the chances of natural conception, but at the same time increases the risk of damage to the ovarian reserve. In some cases, IVF procedures should be considered instead of surgery, within a personalized strategy. It has therefore been proposed that patients with endometriosis are eligible for fertility preservation. SEARCH

methodsThis article is based on a critical review of literature on peer-reviewed article indexing databases including PubMed, Scopus and Medline, using as keywords: 'fertility preservation', 'oocyte vitrification', 'endometriosis', 'endometrioma', 'ovarian reserve' and ' OUTCOMES: Data regarding the feasibility of oocyte cryopreservation in patients with endometriosis have increased over recent years, indicating that these patients seem to have the same number of oocytes retrieved and IVF outcomes similar to those who perform fertility preservation for other indications. However, probably due to a reduced ovarian reserve, several cycles of ovarian stimulation may be needed to gather a suitable number of retrieved oocytes per patient. Age, ovarian reserve, and previous ovarian surgery are the main factors affecting the success of fertility preservation. Bilateral endometriomas, a history of unilateral endometrioma surgery with a contralateral recurrence, and preoperative reduced ovarian reserve are the most common indications for fertility preservation. The choice between primary surgery and ART is often complex, requiring a therapeutic strategy tailored to the patient's clinical characteristics and needs, such as age, type and severity of endometriosis lesions, presence of symptoms, surgical history, and desire for pregnancy. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: The development of endometriosis-related infertility and the severity of ovarian damage due to endometriosis lesions WIDER IMPLICATIONS: Women with endometriosis, and in particular women with bilateral ovarian endometriomas or recurrent surgery on the ovaries, should be advised about risk of ovarian reserve damage. Oocyte cryopreservation is an established technique that has been demonstrated as feasible and successful for these patients; however, the specific indications have not yet been established. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: There are no funding sources for the study and no conflicts of interest to declare.

Indexed as

endometriomaendometriosisfertility preservationIVFoocyte vitrificationovarian reserve

Identifiers

PMID40123895
PMCPMC11930344

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.