Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40123947›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2025

Classification of and detection techniques for RNAi-induced effects in GM plants.

Cecilia Diaz, Steve U Ayobahan, Samson Simon, Luise Zühl, Andreas Schiermeyer, Elke Eilebrecht, Sebastian Eilebrecht

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cecilia DiazDepartment Ecotoxicology, Fraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology IME, Schmallenberg, Germany.
Steve U AyobahanDepartment Ecotoxicogenomics, Fraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology IME, Schmallenberg, Germany.
Samson SimonDivision I 3.2 Synthetic Biology Assessment, Enforcement of Genetic Engineering Act, Federal Agency for Nature Conservation (BfN), Bonn, Germany.
Luise ZühlDivision I 3.2 Synthetic Biology Assessment, Enforcement of Genetic Engineering Act, Federal Agency for Nature Conservation (BfN), Bonn, Germany.
Andreas SchiermeyerDepartment Plant Sciences & Bio-Hybrids, Fraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology IME, Aachen, Germany.
Elke EilebrechtDepartment Ecotoxicology, Fraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology IME, Schmallenberg, Germany.
Sebastian EilebrechtDepartment Ecotoxicogenomics, Fraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology IME, Schmallenberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RNA interference (RNAi) is a biotechnological tool used for gene silencing in plants, with both endogenous and exogenous applications. Endogenous approaches, such as host-induced gene silencing (HIGS), involve genetically modified (GM) plants, while exogenous methods include spray-induced gene silencing (SIGS). The RNAi mechanism hinges on the introduction of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA), which is processed into short interfering RNAs (siRNAs) that degrade specific messenger RNAs (mRNAs). However, unintended effects on non-target organisms and GM plants are a concern due to sequence homologies or siRNA-induced epigenetic changes. Regulatory bodies such as the EPA and EFSA emphasize the need for comprehensive risk assessments. Detecting unintended effects is complex, often relying on bioinformatic tools and untargeted analyses like transcriptomics and metabolomics, though these methods require extensive genomic data. This review aims to classify mechanisms of RNAi effects induced by short interfering RNA from different sources in plants and to identify technologies that can be used to detect these effects. In addition, practical case studies are summarized and discussed in which previously unintended RNAi effects in genetically modified plants have been investigated. Current literature is limited but suggests RNAi is relatively specific, with few unintended effects observed in GM crops. However, further studies are needed to fully understand and mitigate potential risks, particularly those related to transcriptional gene silencing (TGS) mechanisms, which are less predictable than post-transcriptional gene silencing (PTGS). Particularly the application of untargeted approaches such as small RNA sequencing and transcriptomics is recommended for thorough and comprehensive risk assessments.

Indexed as

detection techniquesoff-target effectsRNAi GM plantsRNAi mechanismRNAi pest control

Identifiers

PMID40123947
PMCPMC11925957

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.