Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40124155›Full record

ArticleSouth Asian journal of cancer2025

Consensus Guidelines for the Use of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase (CDK) 4/6 Inhibitors in the Management of Hormone Receptor Positive (HR+ve), Her2-ve Early Breast Cancer (EBC).

Purvish M Parikh, Amish Vora, Rajan Yadav, Akhil Kapoor, Tarini Sahoo, Senthil Rajappa, Govind Babu Kanakashetty, M Vamshi Krishna, Ghanashyam Biswas, Ankur Bahl and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in South Asian journal of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Expert consensus on optimal management of liver-related adverse events during CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Purvish M ParikhDepartment of Clinical Hematology, Sri Ram Cancer Center, Mahatma Gandhi University of Medical Sciences and Technology, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Amish VoraDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hope Oncology Center, New Delhi, India.
Rajan YadavDepartment of Medical Oncology, Gujarat Cancer Research Institute, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Akhil KapoorDepartment of Medical Oncology, Mahamana Pandit Madan Mohan Malviya Cancer Centre and Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6006-2631
Tarini SahooDepartment of Medical Oncology, Silverline Hospital, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Senthil RajappaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Basavatarakam Indo American Cancer Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Govind Babu KanakashettyDepartment of Medical Oncology, St. John's Medical College and Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0000-0002-1303-2226
M Vamshi KrishnaDepartment of Medical Oncology, AIG Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Ghanashyam BiswasDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sparsh Hospitals and Critical Care Pvt Ltd., Bhubaneswar, Orissa, India.
Ankur BahlDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fortis Medical, Gurugram, Haryana, India.
Nikhil GhadyalpatilDepartment of Medical Oncology, Yashoda Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Thirumalairaj RajaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Apollo Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Jyoti BajpaiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Apollo Hospital, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Amol AkhadeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Bethany Hospital, Thane, Maharashtra, India.
Randeep SinghDepartment of Medical Oncology, Narayana Health, Gurugram, Haryana, India.
Shyam AggarwalDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Maheboob BasadeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Saifee Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
S H AdvaniDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sushrusha Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is still not possible for all patients with early breast cancer to be cured. Even when they respond well to initial therapy, there exists a substantial risk for recurrence, sometimes after several years. With the availability of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors the role of adjuvant therapy has improved, and so has the chance of cure. These consensus guidelines will ensure that the community oncologist will be able to take the right decision for their patient. The expert committee shares their real-world experience as well as the consensus voting results. Patients eligible for adjuvant therapy with CDK4/6 inhibitors should start that treatment at the earliest. Based on current published data, abemaciclib is the preferred CDK4/6 inhibitor that should be used in eligible patients (unless contraindicated). To ensure optimal dose intensity and adherence to treatment schedule, use of literature and patient information material can improves compliance. Treatment modification requires early reporting of adverse effects, a responsibility of the patient and caregiver (relatives).

Indexed as

high riskIDFSregulatory approvaltargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID40124155
PMCPMC11925616

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.