ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2025
Preoperative prediction of textbook outcome in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma by interpretable machine learning: A multicenter cohort study.
Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early recurrence prediction after curative-intent surgery of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma using a novel weighted tumor burden score.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Does calculating the textbook outcome based on its negative predictors enhance the transparency of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma surgery assessment?Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2026Article
- Multiphasic Evidential Decision-Making Matrix (MedMax) for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Single-Center Validation Study.Cancers · 2026Article
- Log odds of positive lymph nodes predict surgical prognosis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma based on SEER cohort and nomogram model.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Combining co-expression analysis and machine learning to explore the diagnostic value of complement and coagulation cascade-related genes in asthma and the functional role of SERPINB2.Briefings in functional genomics · 2026Article
- A CRP-Albumin-Lymphocyte (CALLY) Index-Based Nomogram for Predicting Survival After Radical Surgery for Hypopharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
- Decoding serum C-reactive protein-associated molecular patterns in aging and secondhand smoke exposure chronic obstructive pulmonary disease male patients: evidence from cross-sectional, multi-omic and clinical studies.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Decoding astrocytic tryptophan metabolism in the pathogenesis of epilepsy: evidence from artificial intelligence-driven multi-omics and clinical validation.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and prognosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Applications and challenges.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Review
- Outcome prediction for cholangiocarcinoma prognosis: Embracing the machine learning era.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Illuminating the black box: Machine learning enhances preoperative prediction in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in liver cancer surgery: Predicting success before the first incision.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Integrating multi-omics and machine learning to explore the role of amino acid metabolism in intervertebral disk degeneration.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo investigate the preoperative factors influencing textbook outcomes (TO) in Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) patients and evaluate the feasibility of an interpretable machine learning model for preoperative prediction of TO, we developed a machine learning model for preoperative prediction of TO and used the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) technique to illustrate the prediction process.
aimTo analyze the factors influencing textbook outcomes before surgery and to establish interpretable machine learning models for preoperative prediction.
methodsA total of 376 patients diagnosed with ICC were retrospectively collected from four major medical institutions in China, covering the period from 2011 to 2017. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify preoperative variables associated with achieving TO. Based on these variables, an EXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) machine learning prediction model was constructed using the XGBoost package. The SHAP (package: Shapviz) algorithm was employed to visualize each variable's contribution to the model's predictions. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to compare the prognostic differences between the TO-achieving and non-TO-achieving groups.
resultsAmong 376 patients, 287 were included in the training group and 89 in the validation group. Logistic regression identified the following preoperative variables influencing TO: Child-Pugh classification, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score, hepatitis B, and tumor size. The XGBoost prediction model demonstrated high accuracy in internal validation (AUC = 0.8825) and external validation (AUC = 0.8346). Survival analysis revealed that the disease-free survival rates for patients achieving TO at 1, 2, and 3 years were 64.2%, 56.8%, and 43.4%, respectively.
conclusionChild-Pugh classification, ECOG score, hepatitis B, and tumor size are preoperative predictors of TO. In both the training group and the validation group, the machine learning model had certain effectiveness in predicting TO before surgery. The SHAP algorithm provided intuitive visualization of the machine learning prediction process, enhancing its interpretability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.