Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40124661›Full record

ReviewAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2025

Psychological distress in newly diagnosed patients with gastrointestinal cancer: A scoping review.

Ji Yea Lee, Soomin Hong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ji Yea LeeCollege of Nursing, Ajou University, Suwon, South Korea.
Soomin HongRed Cross College of Nursing, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: A cancer diagnosis often triggers significant emotional and psychological challenges, underscoring the importance of addressing psychological distress. While psychological distress in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer has been widely studied, less attention has been focused on those who are newly diagnosed. This scoping review aims to map the existing literature on psychological distress in newly diagnosed patients with GI cancer. Methods: A scoping review was conducted following the framework outlined by Arksey and O'Malley. The last search was carried out on September 23, 2024, across PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, Scopus, and PsychINFO for literature published between January 2013 and September 2024. The search terms included "newly diagnosed," "distress," "patients," and "gastrointestinal cancer." A meta-analysis was conducted using the R package to synthesize the prevalence of psychological distress across studies, with a random-effects model applied to account for heterogeneity. Results: Fifteen studies were included in the analysis, revealing an average prevalence of psychological distress of 28.1% (99% CI: 181.84, 433.39). Psychological distress was most prevalent during the diagnostic phase and gradually decreased over time. Factors such as older age, advanced cancer stage, poor performance status, and a lack of social support contributed to increased psychological distress. Additionally, only 20% of the studies were intervention-based. Conclusions: Approximately one-third of newly diagnosed patients with GI cancer may experience psychological distress. Early identification and intervention to address this distress before treatment initiation are crucial for improving patient outcomes. Systematic review registration: osf.io/n2796.

Indexed as

AnxietyDepressionGastrointestinal neoplasmPsychological distressPsycho-oncologyReview

Identifiers

PMID40124661
PMCPMC11930186

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.