ArticleAmerican heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice2025
Clinical practice patterns among older multimorbid adults presenting with suspected ischemic symptoms: A multi-center survey.
Article in American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Age Differences in Acute Chest Pain Care in a Multisite US Cohort.Clinical cardiology · 2026Observational
- Re-evaluating stress testing paradigms in older adults.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: When patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease (CAD) present with new or worsening ischemic symptoms, initial referral to imaging or optimization of guideline directed medical therapy (GDMT) with deferral of testing are both acceptable management approaches. Methods: In this 12-center study, a 19-item survey exploring preferred management strategy for symptomatic older adults (≥75 years) with or without known CAD, and major patient and clinical factors driving this decision making was administered to clinicians. Results: There were 96 respondents (70.8 % cardiologists, 20.9 % primary care physicians/geriatricians). Among patients without known CAD, 59 (61.4 %) respondents favored early referral to testing, 6 (6.3 %) opted for initial GDMT and 23 (24.0 %) preferred both. For patients with known CAD, 27 (28.1 %) prioritized initial GDMT optimization, 37 (38.6 %) would refer for early testing and 19.8 % both. Key factors influencing initial preference for GDMT optimization were unoptimized anti-anginal medications, patient preference, increased complication risk, frailty, cognitive impairment and comorbidities. Key factors influencing preference for initial imaging were increasing symptom severity, already optimized GDMT, and electrocardiogram changes. When imaging revealed ischemia, clinicians reported weighing symptom severity, ischemic burden, current medications, comorbidities, frailty, and procedural risks before referring for invasive cardiac angiography. Conclusion: Both initial GDMT optimization and referral for imaging are frequently used approaches for the symptomatic older patient with suspected or known CAD. The survey highlighted the importance of patient characteristics such as frailty, cognitive impairment, multimorbidity and the gap in clinical guidance on how to optimally manage symptomatic older adults with CAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.