Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40124734›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of orthopedics2025

Retrieval analysis in total knee arthroplasty.

Emerito Carlos Rodriguez-Merchan, William J Ribbans

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of orthopedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Emerito Carlos Rodriguez-MerchanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Paz-IdiPaz, Madrid 28046, Spain. ecrmerchan@hotmail.com.
William J RibbansFaculty of Health, Education and Society, University of Northampton, Northampton, United Kingdom and The County Clinic, Northampton NN1 5DB, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retrieval analysis in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been little studied in the literature. A narrative review of the literature to understand the current importance of retrieval analysis in TKA has been conducted. On August 27, 2024, a literature search was performed in PubMed using "TKA retrieval analysis" as keywords. A total of 160 articles were found, of which only 19 were analyzed because they were directly related to the subject of this article. Rotating-platform (mobile-bearing) TKA has no surface damage advantage over fixed-bearing TKA. TKAs with central locking mechanisms are more prone to debond from the cement mantle. No major wear of the polyethylene (PE) component in TKA using oxidized zirconium components occurs. Femoral components of cobalt-chromium roughen more than oxidized zirconium femoral components. The use of a polished tibial tray over an unpolished design is advised. At short-run assessment (15 months on average), antioxidant-stabilized highly crosslinked PE components are not clinically different in surface damage, density of crosslinking, or oxidation compared to standard remelted highly crosslinked PE components. A correlation between implant position and PE component surface damage has been reported. It shows the importance of optimizing component position to reduce PE component damage. Contemporary knee tumor megaendoprostheses show notable volumetric metal wear originated at the rotating hinge. Retrieval analysis in TKA renders relevant data on how different prosthetic designs described in the literature perform. Such information can help to improve future prosthetic designs to increase prosthetic survival.

Indexed as

KneeOrthopedicsResultsRetrieval analysisTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID40124734
PMCPMC11924018

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.