ArticleIEEE robotics and automation letters2025
Mode-Unified Intent Estimation of a Robotic Prosthesis using Deep-Learning.
Article in IEEE robotics and automation letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- IFIANet: Frequency Attention Network for Time-Frequency in sEMG-Based Motion Intent Recognition.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traditional robotic knee-ankle prostheses categorize ambulation modes such as level walking, ramps, and stairs. However, human movement scales continuously across various states rather than discretely, making traditional mode classifiers inadequate for accurate intent recognition. This paper proposes a mode-unified intent recognition strategy that continuously estimates terrain slopes across five modes: level ground, ramp ascent/descent, and stair ascent/descent. Locomotion data from 16 individuals with transfemoral amputation were utilized to train slope estimation and mode classification models based on deep temporal convolutional networks. The proposed method was compared to the traditional mode classifier via offline test, using leave-one-subject-out validations for the user-independent performance. The mode-unified slope estimator achieved an MAE of 1.68 ± 0.60 degrees, outperforming the mode classifier's MAE of 1.94 ± 0.97 degrees (p<0.05). The lower slope estimation errors resulted in higher accuracy in replicating knee kinematics of able-bodied subjects, with the proposed system achieving an average MAE of 5.13 ± 2.00 degrees for knee clearance and 6.74 ± 2.97 degrees for knee contact angle, compared to the traditional classifier's 12.10 ± 5.20 degrees and 13.80 ± 3.28 degrees (p<0.01), respectively, in stair ascent. These results suggest that our mode-unified approach can enable continuous adjustment to terrains without mode classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.