ReviewCureus2025
Management of Diabetes in Pregnancy: A Review of Clinical Guidelines and Practices.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Glucose monitoring based on habitual dietary intake as an alternative screening test for diagnosing gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Pooled it
- Association Between HbA1c Levels and Postpartum Depressive Symptoms: Insights from Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale Screening After Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Evaluating midpregnancy Gas6 levels as predictive value for gestational diabetes and birth outcomes.Turkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2026Article
- Photobiomodulation and Low-Level Laser Therapy as Complementary Strategies in Diabetes Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Analysis of Trends in Screening, Assessment, and Monitoring of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Through Bibliometric Analysis.Journal of diabetes research · 2026Article
- Associations between artificial light exposure during pregnancy and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Review
- The Antidiabetic Activity of Wild-Growing and Cultivated Medicinal Plants Used in Romania for Diabetes Mellitus Management: A Phytochemical and Pharmacological Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This literature review assesses clinical guidelines for pre-existing diabetes and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in the areas of diagnosis, management, and maternal-fetal outcomes. A structured search was conducted across PubMed and Google Scholar, supplemented by targeted screening of guideline repositories from the American Diabetes Association (ADA), National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), and World Health Organization (WHO). Included studies and guidelines were selected based on relevance to diagnosis, therapeutic strategies, or maternal-neonatal outcomes, with exclusion criteria applied to non-English publications and non-clinical recommendations. A comparative analysis of guidelines from the ADA, NICE, and WHO was performed to evaluate prevalence, therapeutic approaches, and postpartum management. Early diagnosis, stringent blood glucose control, and multidisciplinary care with the aim to avoid macrosomia, congenital abnormalities, and neonatal hypoglycemia guide the management guidelines. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (<6.5%) optimization and supplementation with folic acid are critically required prior to conception in all women with previously diagnosed diabetes. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and insulin pump therapy are valued but burdened by availability and access constraints. A postpartum visit with 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at 4-12 weeks is essential for the detection of persistent diabetes. Variation of diagnostic criteria among guidelines reflects the requirement for standardization. Expansion of coverage by insurance for CGM and preconception care is important for providing equal access. The cost-effectiveness of new technologies and health disparities in low-resource settings must be addressed in future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.