ReviewAudiology research2025
Vestibular Assessment in Infants with Congenital or Early Onset Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Is Neonatal Vestibular Screening Required? A Scoping Review.
Review in Audiology research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesChildren with congenital or early onset sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) are at a greater risk of vestibular dysfunction (VD), hypothesized to occur from the close embryological relationship between the cochlear and vestibular systems. Even with increasing focus on early detection and rehabilitation through Universal Newborn Hearing Screening (UNHS) programmes in many countries, few studies have focused on the prevalence and feasibility of vestibular assessment in infant populations. The objectives of this review are to 1. identify the prevalence of VD infants with congenital or early onset (<12 months old) SNHL, 2. identify which vestibular assessment tests/protocols are conducted on this population, 3. report sensitivity and specificity values for identified vestibular assessment tests/protocols.
methodsStudies that included infants aged 0-12 months, with congenital or early onset SNHL of any laterality, degree, or configuration, and who underwent any method of vestibular assessment were included. The review adhered to the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidance and the PRISMA-ScR extension statement.
resultsA total of 18 studies were included in the review. All articles reported that infants with congenital or early onset SNHL are at a greater risk of VD, particularly those with bilateral severe-profound SNHL. The cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMP) test was the most frequently identified vestibular assessment tool for this age demographic.
conclusionsResults from the included articles coincide with results from literature assessing older paediatric populations. cVEMPs have been reported to be a feasible, sensitive, and specific screening tool in infants with congenital or early onset SNHL. The prevalence of VD in infants with congenital or early onset SNHL justify further investigation on the feasibility of establishing a pathway for vestibular assessment for all infants referred by UNHS programmes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.