Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40126507›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2025

Optic Nerve Crush Does Not Induce Retinal Ganglion Cell Loss in the Contralateral Eye.

Florianne E Schoot Uiterkamp, Margaret E Maes, Mohammad Amin Alamalhoda, Arsalan Firoozi, Gloria Colombo, Sandra Siegert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Neuroinflammation in glaucoma: a myriad of cellular pathways and players.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Florianne E Schoot UiterkampInstitute of Science and Technology Austria (ISTA), Am Campus 1, Klosterneuburg, Austria.
Margaret E MaesInstitute of Science and Technology Austria (ISTA), Am Campus 1, Klosterneuburg, Austria.
Mohammad Amin AlamalhodaInstitute of Science and Technology Austria (ISTA), Am Campus 1, Klosterneuburg, Austria.
Arsalan FirooziInstitute of Science and Technology Austria (ISTA), Am Campus 1, Klosterneuburg, Austria.
Gloria ColomboInstitute of Science and Technology Austria (ISTA), Am Campus 1, Klosterneuburg, Austria.
Sandra SiegertInstitute of Science and Technology Austria (ISTA), Am Campus 1, Klosterneuburg, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Optic nerve crush (ONC) is a model for studying optic nerve trauma. Unilateral ONC induces massive retinal ganglion cell (RGC) degeneration in the affected eye, leading to vision loss within a month. A common assumption has been that the non-injured contralateral eye is unaffected due to the minimal retino-retinal projections of the RGCs at the chiasm. Yet, recently, microglia, the brain-resident macrophages, have shown a responsive phenotype in the contralateral eye after ONC. Whether RGC loss accompanies this phenotype is still controversial. Methods: Using the available RGCode algorithm and developing our own RGC-Quant deep-learning-based tool, we quantify RGC's total number and density across the entire retina after ONC. Results: We confirm a short-term microglia response in the contralateral eye after ONC, but this did not affect the microglia number. Furthermore, we cannot confirm the previously reported RGC loss between naïve and contralateral retinas 5 weeks after ONC induction across the commonly used Cx3cr1creERT2 and C57BL6/J mouse models. Neither sex nor the direct comparison of the RGC markers Brn3a and RBPMS, with Brn3a co-labeling, on average, 89% of the RBPMS+-cells, explained this discrepancy, suggesting that the early microglia-responsive phenotype does not have immediate consequences on the RGC number. Conclusions: Our results corroborate that unilateral optic nerve injury elicits a microglial response in the uninjured contralateral eye but without RGC loss. Therefore, the contralateral eye should be treated separately and not as an ONC control.

Indexed as

Nerve CrushOptic Nerve InjuriesRetinal DegenerationRetinal Ganglion CellsAnimalsCell CountDisease Models, AnimalFemaleMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMicroglia

Identifiers

PMID40126507
PMCPMC11951053

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.