Evidence mapPaperPMID 40126579Full record

ArticleHealth economics review2025

Diabetes diagnosis based on glucose control levels and time until diagnosis: a regression discontinuity approach to assess the effect on direct healthcare costs.

Toni Mora, Beatriz Rodríguez-Sánchez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health economics review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Toni MoraResearch Institute for Evaluation and Public Policies (IRAPP), Universitat Internacional de Catalunya (UIC), Carrer de la Immaculada, 22, Barcelona, 08017, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2686-5307
Beatriz Rodríguez-SánchezApplied Economics, Public Economics and Political Economy, Faculty of Law, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Plaza Menéndez Pelayo, 4, Madrid, 28040, Spain. brodri13@ucm.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6146-068X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We estimate the difference in direct healthcare costs of individuals diagnosed with diabetes depending on their glucose level, considering different timespans and subgroups. Using data from administrative registers of 285,450 individuals in Catalonia from 2013 to 2017, we used a fuzzy regression discontinuity design to estimate the causal effect of being diagnosed with diabetes at a given timespan (based on an average glucose value equal to or above 6.5%, the treated group) vs. not (having an average glucose level below the threshold, the control group) on healthcare costs across different timespans (6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 months after the first laboratory test) and distances, in days, between the laboratory test and the doctor's diagnosis. When average glucose level was the only independent parameter and the time until diagnosis was 30 days or less, at the cut-off value (6.5%) healthcare costs were between €3,887 and €5,789 lower for the treated group compared to the control group. Smaller differences were reported as the delay in diagnosis increased, even when additionally controlling for sociodemographic characteristics and health status. Our results highlight the importance of prompt diagnosis and might open the debate about the usefulness of the 6.5% reference value in the blood glucose level as the main diagnostic tool in diabetes.

Indexed as

Administrative dataDiabetesFuzzy regression discontinuityGlucose levelHealthcare costs

Identifiers

PMID40126579
PMCPMC11931748

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.