ArticleRheumatology international2025
Controlling nutritional status score as a sensitive instrument for malnutrition screening in systemic sclerosis - a retrospective study.
Article in Rheumatology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- High prevalence of serum zinc and copper deficiencies in systemic sclerosis: a cross-sectional study.Rheumatology international · 2026Observational
- Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score is associated with increased rates of mortality and postoperative complications following hip fracture surgery: a propensity-matched analysis.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026Article
- Sex-specific associations between nutritional status, disease activity, and fatigue in psoriatic arthritis: a cross-sectional analysis.Rheumatology international · 2025Article
- Nutritional Status and Dietary Challenges in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis: A Comprehensive Review.Nutrients · 2025Review
- Frequency of dysphagia among patients submitted to a rheumatology department: a cross-sectional analysis based on the EAT-10 questionnaire.Rheumatology international · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the high prevalence of malnutrition in Systemic Sclerosis (SSc), it often remains overlooked in daily routine. The study aimed to assess the nutritional status of SSc patients using two different tools, concerning their clinical presentation and laboratory results. This retrospective study included 44 SSc patients. We assessed malnutrition with the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) and the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score. Systemic involvement and laboratory parameters were analysed. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA Kruscal-Wallis with post-hoc tests for continuous variables and Chi2 tests for dichotomous variables. The CONUT revealed a substantial proportion of malnourished patients (n = 27; 61,4%), which was higher compared to the assessment with MUST (n = 14; 34,1%). CONUT-undernourished patients had higher C-reactive-protein (28,84 ± 31,72 versus 2,91 ± 2,18, p = 0,0126), higher red-cell-distribution-width (moderate-16,46 ± 2,52 versus normal-13,90 ± 1,03, p = 0,0150), lower hemoglobin (moderate-11,45 ± 2,28 versus normal-13,49 ± 1,28, p = 0,0426), higher N-terminal pro-B-type-natriuretic-peptide (moderate-3790,53 ± 6810,00 versus normal-193,87 ± 265,16, p = 0,0406). However, these observations were not confirmed for MUST-assessed malnutrition. The prevalence of malnutrition in our study was similar to other described cohorts. The CONUT score appeared to be a more sensitive screening tool for malnutrition, however, in patients with cardiological involvement, it may give false-positive results. This study is the first to evaluate SSc patients with the CONUT score, highlighting the need for further research to assess its effectiveness thoroughly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40126645What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.