Trial reportClinical and experimental dental research2025
Comparative Analysis of Adhesive Retention and Denture Weight in Different Residual Ridge Morphologies: A Cross-Over Randomized-Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Clinical and experimental dental research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05063422 (Retentive Strength of Various Dental Adhesives on Various Types of Residual Ridged), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Retentive Strength of Various Dental Adhesives on Various Types of Residual Ridged
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimThe aim of this study was to compare the retentive strengths of various forms of denture adhesives (paste, powder, and strips) on different types of mandibular residual alveolar ridges, considering their respective denture weights. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this crossover randomized-controlled trial, the patients were randomly and equally divided into 3 groups based on clinical features and radiographic findings according to the Wical-Swoope classification. Three forms of denture adhesives were used, including powder, cream, and strips, for three residual ridge types. Quantification of retention without adhesive was carried out as a control. The retentive strength of adhesives was compared in each ridge pattern and correlated with the denture weight. The study was registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov (identifier number: NCT05063422).
resultsThe mean retentive strengths of dentures without adhesive (control) were relatively low across all ridge classifications, ranging from 0.27 to 0.69 lb. In contrast, the experimental groups utilizing Fittydent and Polygrip adhesive products showed significantly improved retentive strengths, with Fittydent cream and Polygrip cream showed the highest enhancement, ranging from 1.01 to 2.57 lb across different ridge types. Furthermore, significant mean differences were observed between ridge classes and the retentive strength of each adhesive product.
conclusionThe study highlights the crucial role of tailored denture adhesive selection in optimizing retention for denture wearers. Polygrip cream demonstrated superior effectiveness across various ridge classifications compared to Fittydent cream, powder, and strips. These findings emphasize the importance of personalized treatment approaches based on ridge types and denture weight.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.