SynthesisOral diseases2025
Tumor-Stroma Ratio in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Oral diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Concordance and Prognostic Impact of Tumor-Stroma Ratio and Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Preoperative Biopsies and Matched Surgical Specimens in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Editorial: Genetic and environmental interactions in oral disease: advancing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Ruthenium-enhanced curcumin derivatives target tumor growth and cancer-related inflammation in head and neck cancer models.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTumor-stroma ratio (TSR) has been recognized as a significant prognostic factor in various cancers. This systematic review evaluates the role of TSR in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and its association with patient outcomes such as overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and lymph node metastasis (LNM).
methodsA comprehensive search was conducted across Scopus, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science. Nineteen studies were included. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed progressively, with meta-analyses. All studies assessed TSR using hematoxylin and eosin staining of tissue samples. The meta-analyses focused on the impact of TSR on OS, DFS, DSS, and LNM, providing pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding confidence intervals (CIs).
resultsMeta-analysis revealed a significant association between TSR and OS (HR 1.99, 95% CI 1.71-2.32, p < 0.001), DFS (HR 2.07, 95% CI 1.80-2.39, p < 0.001), DSS (HR 2.33, 95% CI 1.95-2.78, p < 0.001), and LNM (OR 1.76, 95% CI 1.15-2.70, p = 0.01). Minimal to low heterogeneity was detected among studies, and no publication bias was observed.
conclusionsTSR can effectively identify high-risk patients, being a reliable prognostic marker that could be readily integrated into routine pathology practice for HNSCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.