ArticleJCO global oncology2025
Quality of Care and Survival Outcomes Among Patients With Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer in Nigeria.
Article in JCO global oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An intervention mapping approach to the development and evaluation of a community-based prostate cancer early detection programme in Nigeria.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Prostate Cancer Management in Nigeria: A mini-review of up-to-date treatment options.Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical AssociationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeOptimal survival outcomes of prostate cancer are best achieved through high-quality care for curable disease. In Nigeria, various barriers may impede the curative treatment of prostate cancer, yet their impact on care and patient outcomes remains anecdotal. This study assessed treatment quality, survival outcomes, and interhospital differences of these metrics among patients with clinically localized prostate cancer in Nigeria.
methodsA retrospective study of patients with clinical stage T1-T3a, M0 prostate cancer at three tertiary hospitals in Nigeria over a 3-year period was conducted. Data on hospital sites, sociodemographics, clinicopathologic characteristics, quality metrics, imaging used, treatment, and survival status were collected. The primary end point was time from diagnosis to first treatment. Secondary end points were time from presentation to diagnosis, other prostate cancer quality metrics, all-cause survival, and interhospital differences in these metrics. Quality of diagnostics, treatments, and other outcomes were described and compared using Cox regression.
resultsThis study included 110 patients with a median age of 67 years. Most (n = 66, 61%) had high-risk disease. The median time from tertiary hospital presentation to diagnosis was 31 days. Median time from diagnosis to first treatment of any type was 68 days, with radical radiotherapy was 117 days, and with radical prostatectomy was 104 days. Eighteen percent (n = 20) had guideline-concordant imaging for tumor staging, 67 patients (61%) received any treatment or active surveillance, and retention in care was 42%. Three-year all-cause survival was 41%. There was a significant difference in most quality metrics including guideline-concordant imaging and treatment across the hospital sites.
conclusionTime to treatment was delayed beyond international benchmarks; quality of staging, treatment, and care process were suboptimal; and survival was poor amid geographical disparities in care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.