Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40127678›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2025

Transcriptomic Temperature Stress Responses Show Differentiation Between Biomes for Diverse Plants.

Samuel C Andrew, Rosalie J Harris, Chris Coppin, Adrienne B Nicotra, Andrea Leigh, Karel Mokany

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Samuel C AndrewAgriculture and Food, CSIRO, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4589-2746
Rosalie J HarrisDivision of Plant Sciences, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2600, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6227-5996
Chris CoppinAgriculture and Food, CSIRO, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6144-6562
Adrienne B NicotraDivision of Plant Sciences, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2600, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6578-369X
Andrea LeighSchool of Life Sciences, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3568-2606
Karel MokanyAgriculture and Food, CSIRO, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4199-3697

Funding

Australian Research Council LP180100942Bioplatforms AustraliaCSIRO
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plants are foundational to terrestrial ecosystems, and because they are sessile, they are particularly reliant on physiological plasticity to respond to weather extremes. However, variation in conserved transcriptomic responses to temperature extremes is not well described across plants from contrasting environments. Beyond molecular responses, photosystem II thermal tolerance traits are widely used to assay plant thermal tolerance. To explore options for improving the prediction of thermal tolerance capacity, we investigated variation in the transcriptomic stress responses of 20 native Australian plant species from varied environments, using de novo transcriptome assemblies and 188 RNA-sequencing libraries. We documented gene expression responses for biological processes, to both hot and cold temperature treatments, that were consistent with conserved transcriptomic stress responses seen in model species. The pathways with the most significant responses were generally related to signaling and stress responses. The magnitude of some responses showed differentiation between the species from contrasting arid, alpine, and temperate biomes. This variation among biomes indicated that postheat exposure, alpine and temperate species had greater shifts in expression than arid species and alpine species had weaker responses to the cold treatment. Changes in the median expression of biological processes were also compared to plasticity in photosystem II heat and cold tolerance traits. Gene expression responses showed some expected relationships with photosystem II thermal tolerance plasticity, but these two response types appeared to be mostly independent. Our findings demonstrate the potential for using variation in conserved transcriptomic traits to characterize the sensitivity of plants from diverse taxa to temperature extremes.

Indexed as

Heat-Shock ResponsePlantsStress, PhysiologicalTranscriptomeAustraliaCold TemperatureEcosystemGene Expression Regulation, Plantclimate change vulnerabilitycomparative transcriptomicsde novo transcriptomicslocal adaptationphotosystem II thermal tolerance

Identifiers

PMID40127678
PMCPMC11997244

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.