ReviewMedicine2025
On the rising potential of interdisciplinary rehabilitation in neurological disorders: A mini-review.
Review in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Group rehabilitation for adults with acquired neurological disorders: A systematic review of mono- and interdisciplinary interventions in physical and speech-language therapy.PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2026Pooled it
- Comparative effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions for depression and anxiety in chronic low back pain: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- Behavioral barriers in the management of spinal muscular atrophy: The role of procrastination, regret, and burnout.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Collaboration among health and non-health professionals is growing exponentially as we approach the personalized medicine era, where the intervention plan is tailored according to the patient's needs. This collaboration aims to develop highly efficient, patient-centered, holistic approaches, rather than singular interventions. Interdisciplinary rehabilitation is a rising theme to coordinate the efforts of various professionals, with the ultimate goal of increasing rehabilitants' satisfaction and improving their overall quality of life. A typical rehabilitation team may comprise a rehabilitation physician, rehabilitation nurse, occupational therapist, physiotherapist, speech and language therapist, clinical psychologist, social worker, prosthetist, orthotist, rehabilitation engineer, and dietician. The need for inclusion of additional professions in the rehabilitation team is dynamic and varies depending on the population and health condition. Recently, various countries have begun incorporating interdisciplinary rehabilitation models into their healthcare frameworks. For example, the U.S. Veterans Affairs Polytrauma Rehabilitation Centers have set a precedent for integrating interdisciplinary approaches into neurological rehabilitation, while European nations such as Germany and Sweden have successfully implemented stroke and pain rehabilitation programs. Although interdisciplinary rehabilitation has demonstrated effectiveness in improving patient outcomes, further research is required to explore its long-term benefits, cost-effectiveness, and adaptability in resource-limited settings. In this mini-review, we summarize the current evidence on employing interdisciplinary rehabilitation in patients with neurological disorders and highlight the implications for future research and clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.