ArticleScientific reports2025
FAItH: Federated Analytics and Integrated Differential Privacy with Clustering for Healthcare Monitoring.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Scalable privacy-preserving data analytics for IoMT via FHE and zk-SNARK-enabled edge aggregation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Differential privacy for medical deep learning: methods, tradeoffs, and deployment implications.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Privacy, Security & Governance Frameworks for AI-Powered Wearable Internet of Health Things in Elderly Care: A Comprehensive Review.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Review
- Quantum-entangled neuro-symbolic swarm federation for privacy-preserving IoMT-driven multimodal healthcare.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- MRI management of focal liver lesions: what a beginner cannot fail to know.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- An Update of AI and Radiomics in Precision Oncology: Insights from Liver Tumors as Case Models.Technology in cancer research & treatmentReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Monitoring physical activity is crucial for assessing patient health, particularly in managing chronic diseases and rehabilitation. Wearable devices tracking physical movement play a key role in monitoring elderly individuals or patients with chronic diseases. However, sharing of this data is often restricted by privacy regulations such as GDPR, as well as data ownership and security concerns, limiting its use in collaborative healthcare analysis. Federated analytics (FA) offers a promising solution that enables multiple parties to gain insights without sharing data, but current research focuses more on data protection than actionable insights. Limited exploration exists on analyzing privacy-preserved, aggregated data to uncover patterns for patient monitoring and healthcare interventions. This paper addresses this gap by proposing FAItH, a dual-stage solution that integrates privacy-preserving techniques - Laplace, Gaussian, Exponential and Locally Differentially Private (LDP) noise - on statistical functions (mean, variance, quantile) within a federated analytics environment. The solution employs feature-specific scaling to fine-tune the privacy-utility trade-off, ensuring sensitive features are protected while retaining utility for less sensitive ones. After applying federated analytics (FA) with differential privacy (DP) to generate insights, we introduce clustering to identify patterns in patient activity relevant to healthcare. Using the Human Activity Recognition (HAR) dataset, FAItH shows that privacy-preserving configurations achieve clustering utility nearly equal to non-DP setups, outperforming privacy-preserving clustering algorithms. This balances privacy with effective insights. These results validate FA with DP as a viable solution for secure collaborative analysis in healthcare, enabling meaningful insights without compromising patient privacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.