Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40128311›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

FAItH: Federated Analytics and Integrated Differential Privacy with Clustering for Healthcare Monitoring.

Yousef Alsenani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yousef AlsenaniDepartment of Information Systems, Faculty of Computing and Information Technology, Center of Research Excellence in Artificial Intelligence and Data Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. yalsenani@kau.edu.sa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monitoring physical activity is crucial for assessing patient health, particularly in managing chronic diseases and rehabilitation. Wearable devices tracking physical movement play a key role in monitoring elderly individuals or patients with chronic diseases. However, sharing of this data is often restricted by privacy regulations such as GDPR, as well as data ownership and security concerns, limiting its use in collaborative healthcare analysis. Federated analytics (FA) offers a promising solution that enables multiple parties to gain insights without sharing data, but current research focuses more on data protection than actionable insights. Limited exploration exists on analyzing privacy-preserved, aggregated data to uncover patterns for patient monitoring and healthcare interventions. This paper addresses this gap by proposing FAItH, a dual-stage solution that integrates privacy-preserving techniques - Laplace, Gaussian, Exponential and Locally Differentially Private (LDP) noise - on statistical functions (mean, variance, quantile) within a federated analytics environment. The solution employs feature-specific scaling to fine-tune the privacy-utility trade-off, ensuring sensitive features are protected while retaining utility for less sensitive ones. After applying federated analytics (FA) with differential privacy (DP) to generate insights, we introduce clustering to identify patterns in patient activity relevant to healthcare. Using the Human Activity Recognition (HAR) dataset, FAItH shows that privacy-preserving configurations achieve clustering utility nearly equal to non-DP setups, outperforming privacy-preserving clustering algorithms. This balances privacy with effective insights. These results validate FA with DP as a viable solution for secure collaborative analysis in healthcare, enabling meaningful insights without compromising patient privacy.

Indexed as

PrivacyAlgorithmsCluster AnalysisComputer SecurityConfidentialityHumansMonitoring, PhysiologicWearable Electronic DevicesDifferential privacyFederated analyticsFederated learningHealth informaticsHealth monitoringMachine learningPrivacy-preserving

Identifiers

PMID40128311
PMCPMC11933451

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.