ArticleClinical oral investigations2025
Automatic mandibular third molar and mandibular canal relationship determination based on deep learning models for preoperative risk reduction.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal transformer-enhanced deep learning for accurate assessment of mandibular third molar-inferior alveolar canal contact using panoramic radiography and CBCT slices.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Validation of artificial intelligence-assisted CBCT analysis for predicting inferior alveolar nerve proximity to impacted mandibular third molars: a diagnostic accuracy study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- A machine learning-based predictive model for mandibular third molar extraction difficulty: incorporating multimodal features and SHAP analysis.BMC oral health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study explores the application of deep learning models for classifying the spatial relationship between mandibular third molars and the mandibular canal using cone-beam computed tomography images. Accurate classification of this relationship is essential for preoperative planning, as improper assessment can lead to complications such as inferior alveolar nerve injury during extractions. MATERIALS AND
methodsA dataset of 305 cone-beam computed tomography scans, categorized into three classes (not contacted, nearly contacted, and contacted), was meticulously annotated and validated by maxillofacial radiology experts to ensure reliability. Multiple state-of-the-art convolutional neural networks, including MobileNet, Xception, and DenseNet201, were trained and evaluated. Performance metrics were analysed.
resultsMobileNet achieved the highest overall performance, with an accuracy of 99.44%. Xception and DenseNet201 also demonstrated strong classification capabilities, with accuracies of 98.74% and 98.73%, respectively.
conclusionsThese results highlight the potential of deep learning models to automate and improve the accuracy and consistency of mandibular third molars and the mandibular canal relationship classifications. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The integration of such systems into clinical workflows could enhance surgical risk assessments, streamline diagnostics, and reduce reliance on manual analysis, particularly in resource-constrained settings. This study contributes to advancing the use of artificial intelligence in dental imaging, offering a promising avenue for safer and more efficient surgical planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.