Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40128512›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2025

What patients with cancer require from their clinicians to enable uptake of exercise as part of cancer care: A mixed methods study.

Prue Cormie, Ashleigh Bradford, Lisa Guccione, Peter Martin, Meg Chiswell, Christopher M Doran, Mei Krishnasamy

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Prue CormieDepartment of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia. prue.cormie@petermac.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3446-2698
Ashleigh BradfordDepartment of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
Lisa GuccioneDepartment of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
Peter MartinSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, VIC, Australia.
Meg ChiswellSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, VIC, Australia.
Christopher M DoranCentre Cluster for Resilience and Wellbeing, Appleton and Manna Institutes, Central Queensland University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Mei KrishnasamyDepartment of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDespite robust evidence and a series of evidence-based guidelines stating the benefits of exercise for cancer patients, uptake remains low. This study aimed to explore and describe what patients with cancer require from their clinicians to enable uptake of exercise as part of cancer care.

methodsConcurrent mixed methods design. Participants included adult cancer patients. Online questionnaires and semi-structured telephone interviews explored patient preferences for receiving information about the role of exercise in cancer care. Quantitative data were analysed using standard descriptive statistics and an interpretive descriptive approach was used to inform qualitative analysis.

resultsParticipants included 456 cancer patients. A randomly selected sub-set of 30 patients completed an interview. Many participants (n = 280/61.6%) reported discussion with clinicians as the way they mostly preferred to receive exercise information. Receiving exercise information shortly after being diagnosed and before starting treatment (n = 186/41.1% and n = 90/19.9%) were the timepoints mostly preferred for being informed about exercise. Information that was personalised and described exercise as being important to their cancer care was reported to be more likely to influence exercise behaviour. Clinician actions/provision of resources ranked as most helpful were: referral to cancer-specific exercise specialist (n = 330/76.6%) or program (n = 310/71.8%), and written exercise recommendations from a doctor/nurse (n = 234/54.3%). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Cancer patients would be more likely to consider exercise as part of their cancer care if their clinicians initiated an informed conversation about exercise, introduced early in the care continuum, using personalised and cancer-specific messaging, that was supported by referral to cancer-specific exercise services.

Indexed as

AdviceCancerExerciseHealthcare communicationOncologyPhysical activity

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.