Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40128718›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025

Understanding EMS response times: a machine learning-based analysis.

Peter Hill, Jakob Lederman, Daniel Jonsson, Peter Bolin, Veronica Vicente

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Peter HillRegion Stockholm Health and Medical Care Administration, The Department for Specialized Care, Stockholm, Sweden. peter.hill@ki.se.
Jakob LedermanRegion Stockholm Health and Medical Care Administration, The Department for Specialized Care, Stockholm, Sweden.
Daniel JonssonKTH Royal Institute of Technology, The Department of Urban Planning and Environment, Stockholm, Sweden.
Peter BolinRegion Stockholm Health and Medical Care Administration, The Department for Specialized Care, Stockholm, Sweden.
Veronica VicenteThe Ambulance Medical Service in Stockholm (AISAB), Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmergency Medical Services (EMS) response times are critical for optimizing patient outcomes, particularly in time-sensitive emergencies. This study explores the multifaceted determinants of EMS response times, leveraging machine learning (ML) techniques to identify key factors such as urgency levels, environmental conditions, and geographic variables. The findings aim to inform strategies for enhancing resource allocation and operational efficiency in EMS systems.

methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted using over one million EMS missions from Stockholm, Sweden, between 2017 and 2022. Advanced ML techniques, including Gradient Boosting models, were applied to evaluate the influence of diverse variables such as call handling times, travel times, weather patterns, and resource availability. Feature engineering was employed to extract meaningful insights, and statistical models were used to validate the relationships between key predictors and response times.

resultsThe study revealed a complex interplay of factors influencing EMS response times, aligning with the study's aim to deepen the understanding of these determinants. Key drivers of response time variability included weather conditions, call priority, and resource constraints. ML models, particularly Gradient Boosting, proved effective in quantifying these impacts and provided robust predictions of response times across scenarios. By providing a comprehensive evaluation of these influences, the results support the development of adaptive resource allocation models and evidence-based policies aimed at enhancing EMS efficiency and equity across all call priorities.

conclusionsThis study underscores the potential of ML-driven insights to revolutionize EMS resource allocation strategies. By integrating real-time data on weather, call types, and workload, EMS systems can transition to adaptive deployment models, reducing response times and enhancing equity across priority levels. The research provides a blueprint for implementing predictive analytics in EMS operations, paving the way for evidence-based policies that improve emergency care efficiency and outcomes. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesHealth Care RationingMachine LearningModels, OrganizationalEvidence-Based MedicineHealth PolicyHumansRetrospective StudiesSwedenTime FactorsEmergency care optimizationEmergency medical servicesMachine learningPredictive analyticsResource allocationResponse times

Identifiers

PMID40128718
PMCPMC11934472

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.