ArticleBMC nursing2025
Critical factors shaping vicarious posttraumatic growth in nurses: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors influencing vicarious trauma among Generation Z nursing interns in ICU practice: a cross-sectional study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- The impact of core belief disruption on posttraumatic growth and PTSD in healthcare workers: examining the mediating effect of rumination.BMC psychology · 2025Article
- Vicarious Resilience in Hospital Nurses: A Concept Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNurses face high levels of occupational stress due to direct and indirect trauma exposure, resulting in psychological challenges such as anxiety, depression, and secondary traumatic stress. However, vicarious posttraumatic growth (VPTG), a positive outcome of trauma exposure, can improve resilience and professional satisfaction. Understanding the factors affecting VPTG is key to developing strategies that enhance nurse well-being. This study sought to explore the various factors that affect VPTG among clinical nurses, using a cross-sectional design.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was performed during the period from September to November 2023, involving 1,025 nurses from 13 tertiary and secondary hospitals across China. The study utilized various validated scales, including the Chinese adaptation of the Vicarious Posttraumatic Growth Inventory, the Coping Style Questionnaire, the Perceived Social Support Scale, the Event Related Rumination Inventory, the Interpersonal Reactivity Index, and the Core Beliefs Inventory. Statistical analysis, including Pearson correlation and stepwise multiple regression, was performed using SPSS 27.0 to identify key factors influencing VPTG.
resultsThe average VPTG score was 105.02 (SD = 15.75), with 70.1% of nurses exhibiting low to moderate levels of VPTG. Positive coping (β = 0.358), social support (β = 0.266), core beliefs (β = 0.186), age (β = 0.083), and empathy (β = 0.066) were significant positive predictors of VPTG, while intrusive rumination (β =-0.078) negatively impacted VPTG. Receiving psychological trauma training also contributed positively (β = 0.046). These factors explained 49.8% of the variance in VPTG.
conclusionsPositive coping strategies, social support, core beliefs, and empathy play pivotal roles in enhancing VPTG among nurses. Tailored interventions focusing on these areas could significantly promote VPTG, thereby improving nurse resilience and patient care quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.