Evidence mapPaperPMID 40129249Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2025

Prospective Associations of Body Composition and Body Shape With the Risk of Developing Pancreatic Cancer in the UK Biobank Cohort.

Sofia Christakoudi, Konstantinos K Tsilidis, Marc J Gunter, Elio Riboli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sofia ChristakoudiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9219-4436
Konstantinos K TsilidisDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8452-8472
Marc J GunterDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Elio RiboliDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Funding

NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObesity and diabetes are positively associated with pancreatic cancer risk. It is unclear, however, whether fat or fat-free mass plays a role in these relationships, whether abdominal obesity is more important than general obesity or whether the associations with anthropometric indices and diabetes are independent of each other.

methodsWe used multivariable Cox proportional hazards models to examine the prospective associations of body composition (allometric fat-mass index (AFI) and allometric lean-mass index (ALI), based on bioelectrical impedance, uncorrelated with each other and with height), waist size (allometric waist-to-hip index (WHI), uncorrelated with weight and height) and diabetes with pancreatic cancer risk in UK Biobank. We tested heterogeneity by sex, age and follow-up time with the augmentation method (p_het).

resultsDuring a mean follow-up of 10.4 years, 999 pancreatic cancer cases were ascertained in 427,939 participants. AFI was positively associated with pancreatic cancer risk in participants overall, independent of ALI, WHI, diabetes and covariates (hazard ratio HR = 1.102; 95% confidence interval CI = 1.033-1.176 per 1 standard deviation (SD) increase), more strongly in women aged under 55 years at recruitment (HR = 1.457; 95% CI = 1.181-1.797; p_het = 0.007) and in men only for follow-up 6 years or longer (HR = 1.159; 95% CI = 1.037-1.295; p_het = 0.075). ALI was positively associated with pancreatic cancer risk in participants overall (HR = 1.072; 95% CI = 1.005-1.145), more specifically in men (HR = 1.132; 95% CI = 1.035-1.238; p_het = 0.091). A positive association of WHI with pancreatic cancer risk was observed only in unadjusted models but was lost after adjustment for smoking status and diabetes. Independent of anthropometric indices, diabetes was associated positively with pancreatic cancer risk in participants overall (HR = 1.688; 95% CI = 1.365-2.087), but in women only for follow-up under 6 years (HR = 2.467; 95% CI = 1.477-4.121; p_het = 0.042).

conclusionsGeneral obesity (reflected in AFI and ALI) and diabetes but not abdominal obesity were associated positively with pancreatic cancer risk, independent of each other and covariates.

Indexed as

Body CompositionPancreatic NeoplasmsAdultAgedBiological Specimen BanksBody Mass IndexFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesityProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesRisk FactorsUK Biobankcancer preventioncancer risk factorsepidemiologypancreatic cancer

Identifiers

PMID40129249
PMCPMC11933721

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.