ReviewHealth science reports2025
Identification and Classification Features of Patient Portal, A Systematic Review.
Review in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Patient Portals on Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-Related Quality-of-Care Outcomes: Systematic Review.Online journal of public health informatics · 2026Review
- Design and evaluation patient portal for patients with HTLV-1.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Attitudes and experience of paramedical students toward telehealth in education, a cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: According to different theories in the field of using web technologies, it can be said that portals are one of the most appropriate tools to facilitate the process of care, communication, and education. Therefore, this systematic review aims to identify the features and functions of health portals that are critical for the success and widespread use of patient web-based portals. Methods: On August 28, 2022, a systematic search was conducted without a time limit in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Preferential reporting guidelines for systematic review and meta-analysis studies were followed. Titles and abstracts were independently screened based on eligibility criteria. The checklist was used for data extraction, and finally, started to identify the functional features of patient portals based on the review of retrieved articles. Results: We retrieved 1561 articles after initial screening and removing duplicate articles. After reviewing the title and abstract of the articles and applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, finally, 22 articles were selected for full-text review. The required data were extracted based on the checklist designed for this purpose. A total of 186 features were obtained for the design of the patient portal, which led to the identification of 6 main structural features and 30 content features for the design of the portal. Conclusion: Identifying the structural and content features of patient portals can help healthcare providers and organizations in designing patient portals according to the needs of patients and considering the requirements comprehensively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.