ReviewJournal of molecular and cellular cardiology plus2025
Innovations in heart failure management: The role of cutting-edge biomarkers and multi-omics integration.
Review in Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology plus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Proteomic Remodeling in the Failing Left Ventricle Adapting to Dyssynchrony.Proteomics. Clinical applications · 2026Article
- Review
- Heart Failure with Reduced and Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Network Interpretive Framework of Mechanisms, Phenotypes, and Therapeutic Response.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in heart failure and myeloproliferative neoplasms: clinical applications and risk scores - a narrative review.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2026Review
- Sushi, von Willebrand Factor Type A, EGF and Pentraxin Domain-Containing Protein 1: A Novel Fibroblast-Derived Circulating Biomarker Reflecting Cardiac Fibrosis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Molecular Stability as a Translational Gate: A Structured Framework for Target Validation in Genetic Cardiomyopathy.Cureus · 2026Review
- Revolutionizing Heart Failure Management With Artificial Intelligence: A Narrative Review of Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Innovations.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Exosomal bioactive molecules: molecular regulation, functional heterogeneity, and translational implications in disease diagnostics and therapeutics.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Review
- Therapeutic potential of growth hormone-releasing hormone analogues in cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases: mechanisms and preclinical evidence.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: Challenges and Current Approaches.Research in heart yield and translational medicine · 2026Review
- The lipid-podocyte axis: emerging clues in membranous nephropathy pathogenesis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Integrated transcriptomics and machine learning reveal diagnostic biomarkers and immune-stromal remodeling in ischemic heart failure.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Integrating differential gene expression and Mendelian randomization analyses reveal novel gene for prognosis, immune response, and drug sensitivity in lung cancer.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Integrative multi-omics profiling for early diagnosis, stratification and personalized management of chronic kidney disease: a new paradigm.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025Review
- Heart Failure Biomarkers-Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, Prognosis and Clinical Relevance.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Biomarkers in Heart Failure: A Review and a Wish.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Prognostic Models in Heart Failure: Hope or Hype?Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Molecular Diagnostics in Heart Failure: From Biomarkers to Personalized Medicine.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart failure (HF) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide and represents a major challenge for diagnosis, prognosis and treatment due to its heterogeneity. Traditional biomarkers such as BNP and NT-proBNP are valuable but insufficient to capture the complexity of HF, especially phenotypes such as HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Recent advances in multi-omics technology and novel biomarkers such as cell-free DNA (cfDNA), microRNAs (miRNAs), ST2 and galectin-3 offer transformative potential for HF management. This review explores the integration of these innovative biomarkers into clinical practice and highlights their benefits, such as improved diagnostic accuracy, enhanced risk stratification and non-invasive monitoring capabilities. By leveraging multi-omics approaches, including lipidomics and metabolomics, clinicians can uncover new pathways, refine the classification of HF phenotypes, and develop personalized therapeutic strategies tailored to individual patient profiles. Remarkable advances in proteomics and metabolomics have identified biomarkers associated with key HF mechanisms such as mitochondrial dysfunction, inflammation and fibrosis, paving the way for targeted therapies and early interventions. Despite the promising results, significant challenges remain in translating these findings into routine care, including high costs, technical limitations and the need for large-scale validation studies. This report argues for an integrative, multi-omics-based model to overcome these obstacles and emphasizes the importance of collaboration between researchers, clinicians and policy makers. By linking innovative science with practical applications, multi-omics approaches have the potential to redefine HF management and lead to better patient outcomes and more sustainable healthcare systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.