ReviewJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology2025
Association of
Review in JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The effect of Hp infection on dyslipidemia in Asia and out of Asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Relation between Helicobacter pylori infection and menopausal symptoms in diabetic women.BMC women's health · 2026Article
- Article
- Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Endoscopic Findings ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Correlation between dyslipidaemia and gastric cancer: pathogenesis to prevention and treatment strategies.Lipids in health and disease · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although Methods: We conducted a thorough search up until October 10, 2024, across databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase. Studies that reported lipid profiles in both Results: There were 17 studies with more than 150,000 participants from 681 screened publications. Higher levels of LDL (MD: 5.32 mg/dL; 95% CI: 1.315 to 9.319) and total cholesterol (MD: 6.28 mg/dL; 95% CI: 0.718 to 11.842), as well as lower levels of HDL (MD: -2.06 mg/dL; 95% CI: -3.212 to -0.915), were the results of the meta-analysis. Among those infected, triglyceride levels were likewise higher (MD: 7.93 mg/dL; 95% CI: 0.413 to 15.436), but the odds ratio (OR) did not show a significant increase in risk (OR: 1.002; 95% CI: 0.995 to 1.010). Conclusion:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.