ArticleJAMA network open2025
Diagnostic Utility of Trio-Exome Sequencing for Children With Neurodevelopmental Disorders.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic and clinical utility of exome sequencing and chromosomal microarray in children with GDD/iD: a meta-analysis.Annals of medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Systematic evaluation of whole exome sequencing for copy number variation detection in prenatal diagnosis.Clinical and translational medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Genetic testing and analysis of 1024 children with global developmental delay or intellectual disability: a single-center cohort study.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Neuroregression in Childhood: A Red Flag for Inborn Errors of Metabolism.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Accurate and cost-effective workflow integrating trio pooled-WES for novel gene discovery in neurodevelopmental disorders.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Yield and Genotype-Phenotype Overlap in Pediatric Autism Spectrum Disorder Patients Using Whole-Exome Sequencing and Phenotype-Driven Variant Interpretation: A Single-Center Cohort Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Telethon Undiagnosed Disease Program: Structured approach to solving rare childhood-onset genetic diseases.Genetics in medicine open · 2026Article
- Profiling the developmental signatures of genetic global developmental delay.Pediatric research · 2025Article
- Statistical Methods for Multi-Omics Analysis in Neurodevelopmental Disorders: From High Dimensionality to Mechanistic Insight.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Novel BiallelicGenes · 2025Review
- Genetic Testing of Neurodevelopmental Disorders in Israel.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Case Report: Whole-exome sequencing revealed a de novo variant inFrontiers in genetics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Copy number variants (CNVs) and single-nucleotide variations (SNVs) or insertions and deletions are key genetic contributors to neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs). Traditionally, chromosome microarray and exome sequencing (ES) have been used to detect CNVs and single gene variants, respectively. Objective: To identify genetic variants causing NDDs and evaluate the diagnostic yield and clinical utility of ES by simultaneously analyzing CNVs and SNVs in patients with NDDs and their biologic parents (trios). Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study included pediatric patients with suspected NDDs who visited Shanghai Children's Hospital between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2023. ES was used to investigate trios (trio-ES) including patients with NDDs who remained undiagnosed after phenotype identification and underwent gene panel testing, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification, or karyotyping. Comprehensive clinical and laboratory data were collected. Data were analyzed from July 2022 to December 2023. Exposure: NDDs, characterized by global developmental delay or intellectual disability. Main Outcomes and Measures: The study measured the overall diagnostic yield of SNVs and CNVs in the NDD cohort as well as within NDD syndromic subtypes. Results: Of the 1106 patients with NDDs, 731 (66.1%) were male. The mean (SD) age of patients at diagnosis was 3.80 (2.82) years. The overall diagnostic yield of trio-ES was 46.1% (510 diagnoses among 1106 patients), with 149 CNVs (13.5%), 355 SNVs (32.1%), and 4 cases of uniparental disomy (0.4%). Codiagnosis of SNVs and CNVs occurred in 2 cases (0.2%). Among the trios, 812 candidate germline variants were identified, including 634 SNVs (78.1%), 174 CNVs (21.4%), and 4 cases of uniparental disomy (0.5%). Of these, 423 SNVs (66.7%) and 157 CNVs (90.2%) were diagnostic variants, while 211 SNVs (33.3%) and 17 CNVs (9.8%) were variants of uncertain significance. Sixteen CNVs smaller than 20 kilobase were detected using ES. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, trio-ES, by simultaneously detecting SNVs and CNVs, achieved a diagnostic yield of 46.1%. Trio-ES may be particularly applicable for identifying small CNVs and recessive genetic diseases involving both SNVs and CNVs. These findings suggest that in clinical practice, simultaneously analyzing SNVs and CNVs using trio-ES data has a favorable genetic diagnostic yield for children with NDDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.