ReviewCurrent nutrition reports2025
A Review of the Clinical and Epidemiologic Evidence Relevant to the Impact of Postdiagnosis Isoflavone Intake on Breast Cancer Outcomes.
Review in Current nutrition reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of Dietary Soy Isoflavones Intake Among Women Aged 14 Years and Older in China: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Soy Intake During Childhood and/or Adolescence and Adult Breast Cancer: An Examination of the Early Soy Intake Hypothesis.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Article
- Nutritional Impact on Breast Cancer in Menopausal and Post-Menopausal Patients Treated with Aromatase Inhibitors.Cancers · 2025Review
- A Comprehensive Study on the Nutritional Profile and Shelf Life of a Custom-Formulated Protein Bar Versus a Market-Standard Product.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis narrative review aims to determine the impact of postdiagnosis isoflavone intake, via supplements and foods, on breast cancer outcomes. Foods derived from soybeans are uniquely rich sources of isoflavones, naturally occurring compounds that can bind to estrogen receptors although the extent to which they exert estrogen-like effects in humans is unclear. Isoflavones have been rigorously investigated for a wide range of health benefits including breast cancer prevention. However, their classification as phytoestrogens has led to concern that isoflavones and hence, soy food consumption, could worsen the prognosis of women with breast cancer and interfere with the efficacy of endocrine therapy for this disease. RECENT
findingsResearch in athymic ovariectomized mice shows isoflavones stimulate the growth of existing estrogen-sensitive mammary tumors. However, extensive clinical research indicates that neither soy foods nor isolated isoflavones affect markers of breast cancer risk including mammographic density and breast cell proliferation. No effects are observed even when isoflavone exposure greatly exceeds typical intake in Asian countries. Furthermore, the results from epidemiologic studies indicate postdiagnosis isoflavone intake from soy foods reduces recurrence and possibly mortality from breast cancer. Additionally, the limited observational data do not show that isoflavones interfere with the efficacy of tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors. Regardless of their treatment status, evidence indicates that women with breast cancer can safely consume soy foods. Limiting intake to no more than two servings of traditional Asian soy foods daily, an amount that provides approximately 50 mg isoflavones, is recommended, not because data indicate exceeding this amount is harmful, but because few population-based studies involved participants consuming more than this intake recommendation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.