ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2025
Personalized prediction model for miscarriage: in-depth sperm DNA fragmentation.
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sperm DNA fragmentation and its influence on mammalian reproduction.Nature reviews. Urology · 2026Review
- Normal spermatogenesis in older men is associated with compensatory transcriptome changes.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Sperm DNA fragmentation: how to test, when to test, and what to do with abnormal results-a pragmatic mini-review for clinical practice.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2026Review
- Clustering of sperm by chromatin integrity features reveals breed and monthly effects, as well as a link between double-strand DNA breaks and litter size in pigs.BMC veterinary research · 2026Article
- Double-stranded sperm DNA fragmentation measured with neutral comet assay as a predictor of IVF outcomes: evidence from three European clinics in a multi-centred prospective study.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe investigated how different types of sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) in males, in conjunction with varying levels of female reproductive potential, jointly impact ICSI outcomes.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 195 couples undergoing ICSI, categorizing them by normal or poor prognosis according to POSEIDON criteria. Female factors included age, anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), and oocyte retrieval numbers. Male factors included semen parameters, total SDF, and specific double-strand breaks (DSBs). Reproductive outcomes were followed up at different gestational stages, including clinical pregnancy, early gestation failure, live birth, and miscarriage. Risk factors were identified using univariate and multivariable logistic regression, and their predictive power was assessed via the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
resultsIn the normal group, female factors were primarily associated with reproductive failures. Non-pregnancy cases had lower AMH (4 ng/mL vs. 3.2 ng/mL), and miscarriage cases had fewer oocytes retrieved (15 vs. 10.5). However, the risk factor profile was distinct in poor prognosis. Male factors, including reduced sperm motility (68% vs. 54.5%), lower normal sperm morphology (5.5% vs. 2.5%), and elevated DSBs (7.5% vs. 18.8%) were linked to miscarriage. DSBs presented as the independent predictor of miscarriage risk (odds ratio: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.04-1.36), with a DSB cutoff of 19% providing 81% accuracy in predicting miscarriage.
conclusionPaternal effect is pronounced in women with poor prognosis, where elevated DSBs are linked to an increased risk of miscarriage. We propose a refined pipeline in which DSB testing is considered as initial evaluation before assisted reproductive treatments, especially for infertile couples with poor prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.