SynthesisPloS one2025
Effectiveness of evidence based mental health apps on user health outcome: A systematic literature review.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness of evidence based mental health apps on user health outcome: A systematic literature review.PloS one · 2025Pooled it
- Building a Science-Driven Business: How National Institutes of Health Funding Enabled an Evidence-Based Approach to Maternal Mental Health Innovation.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Developing a Machine Learning Model for Personalized, Predictor-Centric, Adaptive Intervention for Vaping Cessation in Young People: Secondary Data Analysis of Smartphone App Data.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- A framework for culturally adapting mental mHealth apps.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- A user centered evaluation framework for mobile health applications using Fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS: evidence from expert reviews and user experience data.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- The Effectiveness of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Suicidality: An Updated Systematic Review.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Use of mobile app "SUPPORT+" to enhance community palliative care in patients with advanced cancer: A prospective study.Palliative care and social practice · 2025Article
- Use of mHealth interventions to enhance self-regulation and self-efficacy in individuals living with obesity: Scoping review.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Research shows that over 70% of individuals globally who require mental health services lack access to adequate care. Mobile health (mHealth) technologies, such as phone apps, can be a potential solution to this issue by enabling broader and more affordable reach, thus addressing the problem of limited access to care. This study evaluates the effectiveness of evidence-based health apps on user mental health outcomes, particularly depression, anxiety, and suicidal behaviors. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, and IEEE databases. In total, 6894 studies were identified, and 38 studies were selected for the review-thirty out of 38 studies employed randomized controlled trial designs. We identified 35 unique mobile apps. All the apps leveraged Cognitive Behavioral Therapy-based approaches. The most common approaches were context engagement and cognitive change, highlighting a significant focus on using personalized engagement activities and empowering users to alter their perspectives and reframe negative thoughts to improve their mental health. While mental health apps generally positively impact mental health outcomes, the findings also highlight significant variability in their effectiveness. Future studies should prioritize long-term effectiveness, wider reach to ensure it suits a diverse range of people, and the employment of objective evaluation methodologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.