ArticlePloS one2025
Adapting new norms: A mixed-method study exploring mental well-being challenges in dental technology education.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe present study, grounded in the Stress-Adaptation-Growth theory, aims to explore the mental well-being among dental technology students during the post-pandemic period. MATERIALS AND
methodsA mixed-method approach was employed among undergraduate dental technology students in Malaysia. The Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21) was adapted and modified for dental technology students. The content of the questionnaire was validated by two experienced faculty experts. Construct validity and internal consistency were measured. An online survey was created using Google Forms and disseminated to 10 Bachelor of Dental Technology (BDT) students. Meanwhile, qualitative data were obtained through one-on-one semi-structured interviews, employing a phenomenology approach and thematic analysis to explore students' experiences in the new educational landscape.
resultsAll students answered the survey, predominantly females. Prevalence of depression (60% normal, 10% mild, 30% moderate), anxiety (30% normal, 30% mild, 10% moderate, 10% severe, 20% extremely severe), and stress (70% normal, 10% mild, 10% moderate, 10% severe) was reported. Qualitatively, three major themes emerged: "Problems with adaptations", "Anxious about returning to campus", and "Concern about the future". The first theme included sub-themes: "Difficulties in transitioning to hybrid learning" and "Disruption in study-life balance". The second theme had four sub-themes: "Fear of being infected", "Fear of being stigmatized", "Increased vigilance in personal safety measures", and "Confusion about standard operating procedure". The third theme included sub-themes: "Fear of another lockdown" and "Concerns about timely completion of academic requirements".
conclusionsThis study highlights the complex mental health challenges dental technology students faced post-pandemic, underscoring the need for flexible academic policies, global collaborations, and targeted strategies to support their resilience and well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.