ReviewBlood2025
Structure-based design of therapeutics to control hemostasis.
Review in Blood, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A cell motility-based selective hydrogel enables rapid generation of nerve-repairing blood clots.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- Portable radio-frequency identification device for batch identification and rapid verification of blood in emergency medical rescue.Vox sanguinis · 2026Article
- Platelet Products and Artificial Platelets for Regenerative Medicine.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2026Review
- Lyophilized Synthetic Platelets: In Vitro Characterization and In Vivo Evaluation in Mouse Thrombocytopenia Model.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Advances in hemostatic biomaterials: biomimetic strategies, nanotechnology, and smart therapeutics.Burns & trauma · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractHemorrhage causes millions of deaths and hundreds of billions of dollars in medical costs every year, and a large percentage of trauma bleeding-associated deaths occur in the prehospital setting. Bleeding is typically treated with transfused blood products, but this is difficult in the prehospital setting due to limitations in transportation and storage, especially in rural and remote military settings. Advancements in cold-stored platelets and lyophilized blood products have the potential to address some of these limitations. However, devising novel products that continue to improve shelf life, portability, scalability, cost, and safety for patients experiencing bleeding in prehospital settings could greatly improve treatment options and patient outcomes. This review primarily focuses on rational design of material-based approaches to develop novel hemostatic agents that strive to meet limitations of current blood products, especially for use in the prehospital setting. Key topics of consideration include how material design can lead to identification of effective therapies that stop bleeding as well as strategies to iterate on existing designs to enhance healing after cessation of bleeding. Improving performance and functionality of existing and emerging materials could be achieved through the incorporation of transglutaminases, growth factors, cellular components, or inorganic molecules. Finally, consideration of patient-specific factors that influence bleeding, such as patient sex and age, through evaluation of therapies in specific populations and/or design of materials targeted for specific patient populations, is a key area for development of next-generation hemostatic materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.