Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40132895›Full record

ArticleOpen heart2025

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on rates of congenital heart disease procedures among children: prospective cohort analyses of 26 270 procedures in 17 860 children using CVD-COVID-UK consortium record linkage data.

Arun Karthikeyan Suseeladevi, Rachel Denholm, Sonya V Babu-Narayan, Shubhra Sinha, Serban Stoica, Tim Dong, Gianni D Angelini, Cathie L M Sudlow, Venexia Walker, Kate Brown and 3 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Open heart, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Cardiac Surgery During and After the Pandemic: A Retrospective Analysis of UK Trends and Outcomes.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Arun Karthikeyan SuseeladeviPopulation Health Science, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0065-0217
Rachel DenholmPopulation Health Science, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.
Sonya V Babu-NarayanBritish Heart Foundation, Health Data Research UK, London, UK.
Shubhra SinhaTranslational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8554-6704
Serban StoicaTranslational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Tim DongTranslational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1953-0063
Gianni D AngeliniTranslational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3009-5712
Cathie L M SudlowBritish Heart Foundation, Health Data Research UK, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7725-7520
Venexia WalkerPopulation Health Science, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.
Kate BrownGreat Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, UK.
Massimo CaputoTranslational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7508-0891
Debbie A LawlorPopulation Health Science, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK d.a.lawlor@bristol.ac.uk.
CVD-COVID-UK/COVID-IMPACT Consortium

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic necessitated major reallocation of healthcare services. Our aim was to assess the impact on paediatric congenital heart disease (CHD) procedures during different pandemic periods compared with the prepandemic period, to inform appropriate responses to future major health services disruptions. METHODS AND

resultsWe analysed 26 270 procedures from 17 860 children between 1 January 2018 and 31 March 2022 in England, linking them to primary/secondary care data. The study period included prepandemic and pandemic phases, with the latter including three restriction periods and corresponding relaxation periods. We compared procedure characteristics and outcomes between each pandemic period and the prepandemic period. There was a reduction in all procedures across all pandemic periods, with the largest reductions during the first, most severe restriction period (23 March 2020 to 23 June 2020), and the relaxation period following second restrictions (3 December 2020 to 4 January 2021) coinciding with winter pressures. During the first restrictions, median procedures per week dropped by 51 compared with the prepandemic period (80 vs 131 per week, p=4.98×10

conclusionsPrioritisation of urgent, emergency and life-saving procedures during the pandemic, particularly in infants, did not impact paediatric CHD postprocedure complications or mortality. This information is valuable for future major health services disruptions, though longer-term follow-up of the effects of delaying elective surgery is needed.

Indexed as

Cardiac Surgical ProceduresCOVID-19Heart Defects, CongenitalAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolElective Surgical ProceduresEnglandFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMalePandemicsProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2COVID-19Electronic Health RecordsHeart Defects, Congenital

Identifiers

PMID40132895
PMCPMC11938256

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.