ArticleScientific reports2025
Accelerated diffusion-weighted imaging of the prostate employing echo planar imaging with compressed SENSE based reconstruction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning improves image quality in motion-robust and sedation-free pediatric brain MRI.European radiology · 2026Article
- Accelerating prostate MRI: a practical review of modern acquisition strategies.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim was to evaluate accelerated diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of the prostate using echo planar imaging with compressed SENSE based reconstruction (EPICS) and assess its performance in comparison to conventional DWI with parallel imaging. In this single-center, prospective study, 35 men with clinically suspected prostate cancer underwent prostate MRI at 3T. In each patient, two different DWI sequences, one with 3 b-values (b = 100, 400, 800s/mm²) for ADC-calculation and one with b = 1500s/mm², were acquired with conventional SENSE and with EPICS. Quantitative evaluation was done by regions-of-interest (ROIs) analysis of prostate lesions and normal appearing peripheral zones (PZ). Apparent contrast-to-noise (aCNR) and apparent signal-to-noise ratios (aSNR) were calculated. Mean ADC and coefficient of variation (CV) of ADC were compared. For qualitative assessment, artifacts, lesion conspicuity, and overall image quality were rated using a 5-point-Likert-scale (1: nondiagnostic to 5: excellent). Additionally, the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PIRADS 2.1) was rated for DWI. The average total scan time reduction with EPICS was 43%. Quantitative analysis showed no significant differences between conventional SENSE and EPICS, neither for aSNR
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.