ArticleScientific reports2025
Investigating the chemical composition and antifungal effect of Cinnamomum cassia essential oil against Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Acremonium sp.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emerging Technologies and Integrated Strategies for Microbial Detection and Control in Fresh Produce.Microorganisms · 2025Review
- Anticandidal activity ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Essential oils are promising, safe, and eco-friendly alternatives to chemical fungicides. This study aimed to develop an effective biological control agent using Cinnamomum cassia essential oil (CCEO) as potential fungicidal agent against Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Acremonium sp, both isolated from natural orange juice. The yield, chemical composition and antifungal activity of CCEO were evaluated. The essential oil was extracted via hydro-distillation, and its composition was analyzed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The antifungal activity was assessed using the disk diffusion agar method. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC) were determined using microdilution methods. The extraction yield was 2.8%. (E)-cinnamaldehyde was identified as the major compound (37.72%). Inhibition zones ranged from 51 mm to 80 mm against Saccharomyces cerevisiae and from 75 mm to 90 mm against Acremonium sp. Equal MIC and MFC values were recorded for both fungal strains: MIC = MFC = 6.25% against Saccharomyces cerevisiae and MIC = MFC = 3.125% against Acremonium sp. These findings demonstrate for the first time that CCEO could be a promising antifungal agent against the two primary fungal contaminants of fruit products, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Acremonium sp.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.