Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40133709›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Evolution of accessory bones in cetacean skull coupled with decreasing rate of ossification of cranial sutures.

Valeriia Telizhenko, Pavel Gol'din

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Valeriia TelizhenkoSchmalhausen Institute of Zoology, Kyiv, Ukraine. valeriia.dccclxiv@gmail.com.
Pavel Gol'dinSchmalhausen Institute of Zoology, Kyiv, Ukraine. pavelgoldin412@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The skulls of cetaceans (whales, dolphins and porpoises) are distinguished by incomplete ossification of cranial sutures during their lifetime. We suggested suture ossification may correlate with the evolution of rarely reported accessory bones and examine the evolutionary patterns of cranial suture ossification and the presence of accessory elements in the skulls of 47 cetacean species and, for comparison, 15 terrestrial artiodactyls (even-hoofed mammals). A strong phylogenetic signal was found for both suture ossification rate and accessory bone presence. Cetaceans were shown to have a lower ossification rate than most terrestrial artiodactyls, except deer (Cervidae) and mouse deer (Tragulidae), which showed somewhat similar patterns. There were also several types of accessory bony elements, some of them first reported in the skulls of cetaceans and in one case, a muntjac deer. These elements (bones and clefts) evolved in the crania with the least number of ossified sutures. They can be identified as novel elements or, some of them, as plesiomorphies rarely seen in mammals but existing in reptiles and other ancestral groups. This leads to breaking a general trend of mammalian evolution: a reversal of Williston's law (reduction in bone number) and the development of new accessory cranial bones. Slowing cranial development rates explain these trends, and feeding mechanics may be a driver of decreasing suture ossification in cetaceans.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionCetaceaCranial SuturesOsteogenesisSkullAnimalsPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID40133709
PMCPMC11937560

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.