Evidence mapPaperPMID 40133825Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2025

Performance evaluation of structural variation detection using DNBSEQ whole-genome sequencing.

Junhua Rao, Huijuan Luo, Dan An, Xinming Liang, Lihua Peng, Fang Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Junhua Rao *MGI Tech, Shenzhen, 518083, China.
Huijuan Luo *BGI, Shenzhen, 518083, China.
Dan AnMGI Tech, Shenzhen, 518083, China.
Xinming LiangMGI Tech, Shenzhen, 518083, China.
Lihua PengBGI, Shenzhen, 518083, China. penglihua@genomics.cn.
Fang ChenMGI Tech, Shenzhen, 518083, China. fangchen@mgi-tech.com.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2021YFF1200105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDNBSEQ platforms have been widely used for variation detection, including single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) and short insertions and deletions (INDELs), which is comparable to Illumina. However, the performance and even characteristics of structural variations (SVs) detection using DNBSEQ platforms are still unclear.

resultsIn this study, we assessed the detection of SVs using 40 tools on eight DNBSEQ whole-genome sequencing (WGS) datasets and two Illumina WGS datasets of NA12878. Our findings confirmed that the performance of SVs detection using the same tool on DNBSEQ and Illumina datasets was highly consistent, with correlations greater than 0.80 on metrics of number, size, precision and sensitivity, respectively. Furthermore, we constructed a "DNBSEQ" SV set (4,785 SVs) from the DNBSEQ datasets and an "Illumina" SV set (6,797 SVs) from the Illumina datasets. We found that these two SV sets were highly consistent of SV sites and genomic characteristics, including repetitive regions, GC distribution, difficult-to-sequence regions, and gene features, indicating the robustness of our comparative analysis and highlights the value of both platforms in understanding the genomic context of SVs.

conclusionsOur study systematically analyzed and characterized germline SVs detected on WGS datasets sequenced from DNBSEQ platforms, providing a benchmark resource for further studies of SVs using DNBSEQ platforms.

Indexed as

Genome, HumanGenomic Structural VariationWhole Genome SequencingGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansPolymorphism, Single NucleotideDNBSEQStructural variation (SV)Whole-genome sequencing (WGS)

Identifiers

PMID40133825
PMCPMC11938577

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.