ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the maternal health promotion behavior scale.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUnited Nations reports show that maternal health is currently deteriorating in most parts of the world, which is far from achieving the 2030 goal of ensuring good maternal health. Adopting health-promoting behaviors during pregnancy is a safe strategy for maintaining and improving maternal and child health. Owing to the high-dimensional, multivariate, and non-directly measurable characteristics of health-promoting behaviors, a comprehensive assessment of these behaviors will help improve population health. The purpose of this study was to translate and cross-culturally adapt Maternal Health Promotion Behavior Scale, which was specifically developed for the maternal population, and to assess the psychometric properties of its Chinese version.
methodThis cross-sectional study was conducted between May 2023 and August 2024; convenience sampling was used to select pregnant women in late pregnancy who underwent antenatal checkups. First, the original Maternal Health Promotion Behavior Scale was translated into Chinese and culturally adapted. The psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Scale were subsequently assessed, including item analysis, content validity, construct validity, internal consistency reliability, and test-retest reliability.
resultsA total of 296 pregnant women were included. The Chinese version of the Maternal Health Promotion Behavior Scale consists of 36 scored items in 6 dimensions, with item-level Content Validity Index ranging from 0.83 to 1, and the mean scale-level Content Validity Index of all the items is 0.95. Exploratory factor analysis identified 6 potential factors, and confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated a good fit of the data for this structural equation model. The total Cronbach's α coefficient for the scale was 0.837, McDonald's ω coefficient was 0.848, and test-retest reliability was 0.990.
conclusionThe Chinese version of the Maternal Health Promotion Behavior Scale is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring maternal health-promoting behaviors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.