Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40134012›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2025

Assessing the relationship between happiness and professional autonomy among clinical nurses: an analytical cross-sectional study.

Kimia Faridi, Mohammad Ail Mohamadi, Saeid Mehri, Behrouz Dadkhah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kimia FaridiMedical-Surgical Nursing, Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-6991-5448
Mohammad Ail MohamadiDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-5609-129X
Saeid MehriDepartment of Emergency Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2491-1063
Behrouz DadkhahDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran. behrouz.dadkhah@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5925-2905

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical nurses' well-being is crucial for enhancing their performance and the quality of patient care. Understanding the factors influencing nurses' happiness, including professional autonomy, is essential in addressing workplace stress and dissatisfaction.

aimsThis study aims to investigate the relationship between happiness and professional autonomy among clinical nurses, providing insights that can help improve job satisfaction and patient care.

methodsAn analytical cross-sectional study was conducted in Ardabil, Iran, involving 270 nurses selected through stratified sampling from May to December 2022. Data were collected using the Oxford Happiness Questionnaire and the Dempster Professional Autonomy Scale. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS.

resultsThe mean happiness score was 65.62 (SD = 14.11), with 70% of nurses reporting acceptable to high happiness levels. The mean professional autonomy score was 94.72 (SD = 13.17). A significant positive correlation was found between happiness and professional autonomy (r = 0.67, p < 0.001). Work experience and income satisfaction were also associated with higher happiness levels.

conclusionsThe findings indicate that enhancing professional autonomy can increase nurses' happiness. Creating supportive work environments that promote autonomy is essential for improving nurse well-being and the overall quality of healthcare delivery.

Indexed as

Clinical nurseHappinessProfessional autonomyWell-being

Identifiers

PMID40134012
PMCPMC11938579

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.