ArticleBMC research notes2025
Comparing the effect of using calcified autogenous nano dentin particles versus micro dentin particles in the healing of mandibular bony defects in New Zealand rabbits.
Article in BMC research notes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of hUCMSC-seeded hydroxyapatite-chitosan scaffolds on immunomodulatory cytokine expression during alveolar socket healing: an in vivo study.Odontology · 2026Article
- Alveolar socket preservation with human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell-seeded hydroxyapatite-chitosan scaffolds: An in vivo assessment of osteoprotegerin and receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB expression.Journal of molecular histology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to compare the regenerative effect of autogenous micro-dentin and nano-dentin particles on bone regeneration in rabbits' mandibular defects. Sixty adult New Zealand rabbits were randomly divided into three groups: a control group, a micro-dentin group, and a nano-dentin group. A critical-sized bony defect was created at the lower border of the mandible. Bone regeneration was evaluated at two, four, and eight weeks using light microscopy, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans, and histomorphometric analysis.
resultsNano-dentin significantly enhanced bone density and defect closure, as evidenced by CBCT and histological analyses. At eight weeks, it promoted extensive new bone formation, nearly bridging the defect, with minimal residual graft material compared to the micro-dentin group. Histomorphometric analysis confirmed its superior osteogenic potential, demonstrating enhanced bone regeneration and graft resorption. These findings highlight nano-dentin as a highly effective biomaterial for mandibular bone repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.