Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40134050›Full record

ArticleBMC nutrition2025

The MIND diet, cognitive function, and well-being among healthy adults at midlife: a randomised feasibility trial.

Deirdre Timlin, Jacqueline M McCormack, Maeve Kerr, Laura Keaver, Ellen E A Simpson

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04654936 (Feasibility and Acceptability of a 12 Week Online Dietary Intervention Promoting the MIND Diet Using the COM-B Model), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04654936 nacompletednot on this map

Feasibility and Acceptability of a 12 Week Online Dietary Intervention Promoting the MIND Diet Using the COM-B Model

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of UlsterRan2019 to 2019Enrolled41ConditionsCognitive ChangeArmsMIND diet, MIND diet with no support
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Deirdre TimlinDepartment of Psychology, Rockhampton Hospital, Queensland Health, Rockhampton, Australia.
Jacqueline M McCormackFaculty of Science, Atlantic Technology University, Sligo, Ireland.
Maeve KerrNutrition Innovation Centre for Food and Health (NICHE), Ulster University, Coleraine, UK.
Laura KeaverFaculty of Science, Atlantic Technology University, Sligo, Ireland.
Ellen E A SimpsonPsychology Research Institute, Ulster University, Coleraine, UK. eea.simpson@ulster.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Mediterranean and Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diets have been shown to slow cognitive decline. However, these diets were not originally developed with dementia prevention as their primary focus. In contrast, the Mediterranean-DASH Intervention for Neurodegenerative Delay (MIND) diet was specifically designed based on evidence linking individual dietary components to brain health and the prevention of cognitive decline. The aim of this research was to test the effectiveness of the MIND diet on cognitive function, mood, and quality of life using the Behaviour Change Wheel, and to design an intervention using the COM-B model to promote the MIND diet at midlife.

methodsAn online pilot randomised control trial (RCT) was conducted. Forty-one participants (aged 40-55 years, male and female) were randomised into a MIND diet with support group (n = 15), MIND diet group with no support (n = 14) or control group (n = 12) for 12 weeks. Baseline and follow-up measures of cognitive function, mood, quality of life (QOL) and adherence to MIND diet was assessed in each group. Capability, opportunity, and motivation (COM-B) towards MIND diet behaviour were also assessed pre and post intervention.

resultsA repeated measures ANOVA showed that in comparison to the control group, both intervention groups significantly improved mood, quality of life, MIND diet score and all COM-B components at follow-up (p < 0.05). No significant differences or interactions in cognitive function were found between groups.

conclusionThere are only two RCT's that test the effectiveness of the MIND diet on cognitive function, and this is the first RCT to assess the usefulness of the COM-B in increasing adherence to the MIND diet. Future interventions with longer duration are needed to establish an association with MIND diet and cognitive function in adults at midlife. This study recommends using less Behaviour Change Techniques (BCTs) with a focus on self-monitoring, goal setting and education on diet as an effective strategy for promoting adherence to the MIND diet.

trial registrationTrial registered at ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Record NCT04654936, May 2019.

Indexed as

Cognitive functionMid lifeMIND diet

Identifiers

PMID40134050
PMCPMC11938686

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.