Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40134216›Full record

ReviewBiophysical journal2025

Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy for particle sizing: A notorious challenge.

Jan-Hagen Krohn, Adam Mamot, Nastasja Kaletta, Yusuf Qutbuddin, Petra Schwille

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. ACS central science · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jan-Hagen KrohnDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Biophysics, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany; Exzellenzcluster ORIGINS, Garching, Germany.
Adam MamotDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Biophysics, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany.
Nastasja KalettaDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Biophysics, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany.
Yusuf QutbuddinDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Biophysics, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany.
Petra SchwilleDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Biophysics, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany; Exzellenzcluster ORIGINS, Garching, Germany. Electronic address: schwille@biochem.mpg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In many quantitative investigations of biological systems, including, e.g., the study of biomolecular interactions, assembly and disassembly, aggregation, micelle and vesicle formation, or drug encapsulation, accurate determination of particle sizes is of key interest. Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS), with its exceptional sensitivity for molecular diffusion properties, has long been proposed as a valuable method to size small, freely diffusible particles with superior precision. It is conceptually related to the more widespread particle sizing technique dynamic light scattering (DLS) but offers greater selectivity and sensitivity due to the use of fluorescence rather than scattered light. However, in spite of these apparent advantages, FCS has never become established as a biophysical routine for particle sizing. This is due to the fact that sensitivity can, under certain conditions, indeed be disadvantageous, as it renders the technique error prone and overly susceptible to signal disturbances. Here, we discuss the systematic challenges, as well as the advances made over the past decades, to employing FCS in polydisperse samples. The problematic role of large particles, a common issue in DLS and FCS, and the effect of fluorescent labeling are discussed in detail, along with strategies for respective error mitigation in experiments and data analysis. We expect this overview to guide future users in successfully applying FCS to their particle sizing problems in the hope of fostering a more widespread and routine use of FCS-based technology.

Indexed as

Particle SizeDynamic Light ScatteringSpectrometry, Fluorescence

Identifiers

PMID40134216
PMCPMC12709271

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.