Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40134268›Full record

ReviewThe American journal of psychiatry2025

20 Years of Aberrant Salience in Psychosis: What Have We Learned?

Philip R Corlett, Kurt M Fraser

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The American journal of psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. An etiological approach to psychosis: potential benefits for treatment, research and prevention.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The hippocampus as a generative model.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Philip R CorlettWu Tsai Institute, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychology, Yale University, New Haven (Corlett); Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Fraser).ORCID 0000-0002-5368-1992
Kurt M FraserWu Tsai Institute, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychology, Yale University, New Haven (Corlett); Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Fraser).ORCID 0000-0002-2988-7683

Funding

Predictive Coding as a Framework for Understanding PsychosisR01MH112887 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI CORLETT, PHILIP, GOLD, JAMES M. · 2018 to 2022
$3.6M
5/5 CAPER: Computerized Assessment of Psychosis RiskR01MH120089 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CORLETT, PHILIP, WOODS, SCOTT W · 2020 to 2024
$3.1M
Explaining Paranoia: Computational Modeling of Belief Updating in the General PopulationR21MH120799 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CORLETT, PHILIP · 2019 to 2020
$404k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112887NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH120089NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH120799
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Twenty years ago Shitij Kapur's "

Indexed as

DelusionsDopaminePsychotic DisordersBrainHallucinationsHumansDopamineCognitive NeuroscienceDelusionsDopamineHallucinationsIncentiveMotivationPrediction ErrorPsychosisPsychosis see Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic DisordersSalience

Identifiers

PMID40134268
PMCPMC12949980

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.