ArticleInternational journal of clinical practice2022
Clinical Outcomes Based on the Attainment of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Targets in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome in Real-World Practice.
Article in International journal of clinical practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of Clinical Outcomes between Newly Diagnosed and Pre-Existing Diabetes Mellitus Patients after Acute Coronary Syndrome.Current vascular pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: A target of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) <70 mg/dL or ≥50% reduction should be set. This study aimed to explore the information required to attain the optimal goal of lipid control for patients with ACS in real-world practice using big database analysis. Methods: Patients with ACS were enrolled between January 2005 and December 2019, and their medical history was obtained from the Chang Gung Research database. According to the attainment of LDL-C levels, the study population was divided into groups with and without ≥50% reduced LDL-C levels. In the group that achieved ≥50% reduced LDL-C levels, the study population was subdivided into groups with and without achievement of LDL-C level < 70 mg/dL. Results: This study enrolled 14,520 participants, out of whom only 3,367 patients (23.2%) achieved ≥50% reduced LDL-C levels. At the 3-year follow-up periods, higher incidences of cardiovascular (CV) mortality and all-cause mortality were absorbed in patients without ≥50% reduced LDL-C levels, especially in subgroups of hypertension and diabetes mellitus (DM). When comparing different percentages of reduced LDL-C levels, the significantly lowest hazard ratio (HR) of CV and all-cause mortality was noted at ≥50% reduced LDL-C levels (CV mortality; HR: 0.64; all-cause mortality; HR: 0.57). Conclusion: In the ACS population, better clinical outcomes were yielded in patients with ≥50% reduced LDL-C levels, especially in the hypertension and DM populations. However, strict lipid control did not show better clinical outcomes in patients with ≥50% reduction and <70 mg/dL in LDL-C levels.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.