Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40134593›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

Integrating quantitative DCE-MRI parameters and radiomic features for improved IDH mutation prediction in gliomas.

Meiping Ye, Zehong Cao, Zhengyang Zhu, Sixuan Chen, Jianan Zhou, Huiquan Yang, Xin Li, Qian Chen, Wei Luan, Ming Li and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Meiping Ye *Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Zehong Cao *Department of Research and Development, United Imaging Intelligence, Shanghai, China.
Zhengyang ZhuDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Sixuan ChenDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Jianan ZhouInstitute of Medical Imaging and Artificial Intelligence, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Huiquan YangDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Xin LiDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Qian ChenDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Wei LuanDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Ming LiDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Chuanshuai TianDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Tianyang SunDepartment of Research and Development, United Imaging Intelligence, Shanghai, China.
Feng ShiDepartment of Research and Development, United Imaging Intelligence, Shanghai, China.
Xin ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Bing ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To develop and validate a multiparametric prognostic model, incorporating dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) quantitative parameters and multi-modality radiomic features, for the accurate identification of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutation status from glioma patients. Methods: A total of 152 glioma patient data with confirmed IDH1 mutation status were retrospectively collected. A segmentation neural network was used to measure MRI quantitative parameters compared with the empirically oriented ROI selection. Radiomic features, extracted from conventional MR images (T1CE, T2W, and ADC), and DCE quantitative parameter images were combined with MRI quantitative parameters in our research to predict IDH1 mutation status. We constructed and analyzed Clinical Models 1-2 (corresponding to manual and automatic MRI quantitative parameters), Radiomic Feature Models 1-3 (corresponding to structural MRI, DCE, and multi-modality respectively), and a Multivariable Combined Model. We tried different usual classifiers and selected logistic regression according to AUC. Fivefold cross-validation was applied for validation. Results: The Multivariable Combined Model showed the best prediction performance (AUC, 0.915; 95% CI: 0.87, 0.96) in the validation cohort. The Multivariable Combined Model performed better than Clinical Model 1 and Radiomic Feature Model 1 (DeLong all p < 0.05), and Radiomic Feature Model 3 performed better than Radiomic Feature Model 1 (DeLong p < 0.05). Conclusions: Compared with the conventional MRI Radiomics and Clinical Models, the Multivariable Combined Model, mainly based on DCE quantitative parameters and multi-modality Radiomics features, is the most promising and deserves attention in the current study.

Indexed as

dynamic contrast enhancedgliomalogistic regressionquantitative parameterradiomics

Identifiers

PMID40134593
PMCPMC11932857

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.