ReviewRSC advances2025
Adhering to recommended dietary protein intake for optimizing human health benefits
Review in RSC advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Food-grade utilization of bovine slaughterhouse by-products for developing cost-effective media supplements in cultivated meat applications.Food science of animal resources · 2026Review
- Association between low-carbohydrate diet score and childhood obesity: a national population-based study.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Germinated Brown Rice: A Natural Source of Bioactive Compounds Boosting Human Health.International journal of food science · 2026Review
- Translating nutrition science into national policy: comparative assessment of the 2025-2030 U. S. Dietary Guidelines and the Italian Mediterranean-based guidelines.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- A Review of the Role of Paraprobiotics in the Formulation of High-Protein Ice Cream as an Advanced Functional Food.International journal of food science · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Proteins are essential nutrients that contribute to the structure of various cells and tissues in the body. Consuming adequate protein in our diet is crucial for optimal health and bodily function. This review article explores the role of dietary proteins by examining global consumption patterns and consumer perceptions of high-protein diets. It investigates recent research trends regarding the impact of proteins on human health and wellness across various countries and communities. The review analyzes key health outcomes associated with very high-protein diets, especially those exceeding recommended values. It includes the latest evidence on the influences of animal and plant proteins on health in different groups of participants. Furthermore, this manuscript delves into the scientific discussion surrounding the optimal amount of protein in the human diet.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.