ArticleSchizophrenia research. Cognition2025
Evaluation of a brief online multi-index assessment for predicting increased psychotic-like experiences in the community: A perceptual, cognitive and affective approach.
Article in Schizophrenia research. Cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Research has shown that impairments in perception, reasoning, and social cognition are evident across the psychosis continuum and are implicated in the transition from subclinical symptoms to clinical psychosis. In this pilot feasibility study, a brief computerised assessment of visual perception, reasoning, social cognition and emotion dysregulation was administered to 157 adults in the community alongside self-report measures of psychotic-like experiences. The feasibility, reliability, and the predictive validity of the assessment tool were examined. The assessment procedure was feasible, evidenced through high completion rates. However, reliability estimates were suboptimal for online assessment measures. Self-reported visual perception and state emotion dysregulation predicted psychotic-like experiences explaining 53% of the variance when controlling for age. This study provides preliminary evidence that state difficulties with emotion regulation and self-reported visual perception abnormalities can predict increased psychotic-like experiences in the community. Future adaptations could address technological issues encountered with assessment tasks and ensure measures are psychometrically robust when administered online. Brief online assessments hold potential for research of both cognition and affect along the psychosis continuum although caution must be exercised with the chosen methodology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.