Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40134990›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia research. Cognition2025

Evaluation of a brief online multi-index assessment for predicting increased psychotic-like experiences in the community: A perceptual, cognitive and affective approach.

Caroline Cullen, Keith Gaynor, Klaus Kessler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia research. Cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Caroline CullenSchool of Psychology, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Keith GaynorSchool of Psychology, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Klaus KesslerSchool of Psychology, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research has shown that impairments in perception, reasoning, and social cognition are evident across the psychosis continuum and are implicated in the transition from subclinical symptoms to clinical psychosis. In this pilot feasibility study, a brief computerised assessment of visual perception, reasoning, social cognition and emotion dysregulation was administered to 157 adults in the community alongside self-report measures of psychotic-like experiences. The feasibility, reliability, and the predictive validity of the assessment tool were examined. The assessment procedure was feasible, evidenced through high completion rates. However, reliability estimates were suboptimal for online assessment measures. Self-reported visual perception and state emotion dysregulation predicted psychotic-like experiences explaining 53% of the variance when controlling for age. This study provides preliminary evidence that state difficulties with emotion regulation and self-reported visual perception abnormalities can predict increased psychotic-like experiences in the community. Future adaptations could address technological issues encountered with assessment tasks and ensure measures are psychometrically robust when administered online. Brief online assessments hold potential for research of both cognition and affect along the psychosis continuum although caution must be exercised with the chosen methodology.

Indexed as

CognitionCommunity sampleEmotion dysregulationOnline assessmentPsychotic-like experiences

Identifiers

PMID40134990
PMCPMC11932870

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.