ReviewThe Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology2025
Managing Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma: A Guide for the Dermatology Clinician.
Review in The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advances in Targeted and Immunotherapy for High-Risk Cutaneous Malignancies.Oncology research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common form of skin cancer. Advanced BCCs include locally advanced BCCs (laBCCs), primary or recurrent tumors that are not amenable to surgery or radiation therapy, and metastatic BCCs (mBCCs). The management of advanced BCC has been revolutionized in recent years by the development of hedgehog inhibitors (HHIs) and immunotherapies (ie, PD-1 inhibitors). We aim to review the current literature on therapeutic options and outline treatment strategies to optimize care for patients with advanced BCC. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was completed using the keywords "advanced basal cell carcinoma," "treatment," "hedgehog inhibitor," "vismodegib," "sonidegib," "PD1-inhibitor," and "cemiplimab." The authors reviewed all studies and included those which addressed the topic of the review. Results: Surgery or radiotherapy may not be an option for certain high-risk BCCs due to due to invasion into local tissue, location near anatomically sensitive areas, or metastasis. There is increasing evidence for the efficacy of HHIs, including vismodegib and sonidegib, as the first-line treatment for these advanced BCCs. Despite known efficacy, utility of HHIs can be limited by their adverse event profiles. If patients fail HHIs due to inefficacy or adverse effects, there is evidence for use of the PD-1 inhibitor cemiplimab. Limitations: This is a review article and is limited by the information available in the published literature. In addition, comparison between studies is limited as they utilized varying methodologies. Conclusion: Treatment of advanced BCCs can be complex and poses challenges for clinicians. HHIs are currently the first-line treatments for laBCC and mBCC, while cemiplimab can be used if patients do not respond to or are unable to tolerate HHIs, or for whom HHIs are not appropriate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40135179PMC11932100What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.